Originally posted by boarmanHave a look at the tape. it shows a plane hitting.
did america fire a missile into their own pentagon?
i have just watched a documentary that shows that a plane was not responsible for the damage caused to the pentagon.nor was there any evidence to prove that a plane crashed there . it was even more interesting to hear from ex american defence personnel that it looks like damage a missile or bunker buster would do . just like to hear anybody elses thoughts ,please try to be sensible
Beleive what you want!
Originally posted by General PutzerAll, I know is I saw something on the nightly news program last week that was supposed to be new evidence released by the pentagon and I haven't been able to find it. It was supposed to be taken from across the street or something and I saw a glare but nothing the size of a commercial airliner. I was hoping that they found something that actually showed the plane. It is hard to believe something that is supposed to be as secure as the pentagon couldn't come up with better photos. I mean it would be nice.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
This should point you in the right direction
Originally posted by cashthetrashtotally agree at least someone is seeing it for what it is
All, I know is I saw something on the nightly news program last week that was supposed to be new evidence released by the pentagon and I haven't been able to find it. It was supposed to be taken from across the street or something and I saw a glare but nothing the size of a commercial airliner. I was hoping that they found something that actually showed ...[text shortened]... to be as secure as the pentagon couldn't come up with better photos. I mean it would be nice.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
um do you realise at the distance away the camera is the plane my possibly be in shot for one frame. and could be missed entirely. conspiracy theorys are allways highly apealing and almost always completly and obviousely wrong. this doesn't stop people beleiving in them. see: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flatearth.html
and http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm for two of the mirriad of examples. their is also a quite entertaining one about the titanic.
"Rules are there to make you think before you break them"
Originally posted by googlefudgeeven at a distance you would still clearly see more than a partial image of a plane . It still does not explain why peoples video cameras were confiscated.It is whats on these that clearly would show WHAT ACTUALLY HIT THE PENTAGON.If it is a plane then why confiscate their cameras,do the american government have something else to hide?
um do you realise at the distance away the camera is the plane my possibly be in shot for one frame. and could be missed entirely. conspiracy theorys are allways highly apealing and almost always completly and obviousely wrong. this doesn't stop people beleiving in them. see: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flatearth.html
and http://www.lunaranomalies.c ...[text shortened]... ertaining one about the titanic.
"Rules are there to make you think before you break them"
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
you mean other than the fact that someone maneged to hit the pentagon with a plane? recordings of what hoe fast they responded the leval of damage and so on are things that a secret service may well not want public. conviscating video cameras could mean anything. it isn't even close to proof of a massive and pointless conspiricy. try using occams razor. or common sense (another oxymoron) whichever comes easyer.
Originally posted by googlefudgeif they did release those recordings they could dismiss all this conspiracy stuff, but maybe they like all the talk it generates.
you mean other than the fact that someone maneged to hit the pentagon with a plane? recordings of what hoe fast they responded the leval of damage and so on are things that a secret service may well not want public. conviscating video cameras could mean anything. it isn't even close to proof of a massive and pointless conspiricy. try using occams razor. or common sense (another oxymoron) whichever comes easyer.
We could go on about this forever , i was just relaying what i saw and thought it would make a good topic to discuss and to see what other peoples thoughts were.
Its obviously had an effect on people
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
yes it has. 9/11 was tradgady on an almighty scale. people get upset when people sugest theorys that belittle what happened with no credible evidence, in the same way people get upset when it is suggested the nazi death camps didn't exist. it's tasteless, shows a complete lack of coherant thought, huge ignorence, ar supreme callusness. go back to the debate forum where your theory is being shredded.
Originally posted by boarmanThat particular horse has been beaten to death. BTW, if a real bunker buster bomb had hit the pentagon, there wouldn't have been much left of it. The idea of a bunker buster is to go deep into the basement and into the ground underneath and make a crater about 100 feet deep. There was just such a device used on a hit on Saddam which it turned out he was not there but the resultant destruction showed a hole in the ground that looked like a junior A bomb had gone off. Trust me on this one, that was no bunker buster that hit the pentagon.
maybe you could start a new thread about that
it could make for interesting talk
Originally posted by googlefudgei have and its not really being shredded.Its also not my theory i told you before that its a video i just watched and was posting the question to see other peoples thoughts
yes it has. 9/11 was tradgady on an almighty scale. people get upset when people sugest theorys that belittle what happened with no credible evidence, in the same way people get upset when it is suggested the nazi death camps didn't exist. it's tasteless, shows a complete lack of coherant thought, huge ignorence, ar supreme callusness. go back to the debate forum where your theory is being shredded.