Originally posted by HandyAndyEvidence that media is biased?
Would you care to share your evidence?
Does reading their publications or watching their transmissions count as evidence?
If you're looking for examples, a casual review of the Democratic nomination process currently underway is a pretty solid one: to hear nearly every media outlet, Clinton is and has been the presumptive nominee, despite demonstrative and overwhelming support for Sanders.
Little to nothing is covered relative to the numerous fraudulent activities adversely impacting the voting which was in Sanders' favor.
The story is what they want it to be, not the reality.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHEvidence that all news and media sources are biased.
Evidence that media is biased?
Does reading their publications or watching their transmissions count as evidence?
If you're looking for examples, a casual review of the Democratic nomination process currently underway is a pretty solid one: to hear nearly every media outlet, Clinton is and has been the presumptive nominee, despite demonstrative and overw ...[text shortened]... the voting which was in Sanders' favor.
The story is what they want it to be, not the reality.
We can agree on many, but he said all. It bothers me when people with limited knowledge generalize.
Originally posted by HandyAndyThose who generalize ought to be shot.
Evidence that [b]all news and media sources are biased.
We can agree on many, but he said all. It bothers me when people with limited knowledge generalize.[/b]
Generalizers have no idea what they're in for.
But then again, I would also mete out the same punishment for ending sentences with a preposition.
Originally posted by HandyAndyOn a more serious note, although I have found pockets of truth by using an amalgamation of several resources, I have yet to find a single media source which is not biased.
Evidence that [b]all news and media sources are biased.
We can agree on many, but he said all. It bothers me when people with limited knowledge generalize.[/b]
Whatchewgot?
2 edits
Originally posted by HandyAndyYes all, infact I think one could subject the premise to falsification by seeking its converse, in other words is there a news agency that does not have a bias, Do you know of one because I don't. I saw a product the other day that was named the handy andies and was instantly reminded of you and thought of how apt it was they were tissue papers.
Evidence that [b]all news and media sources are biased.
We can agree on many, but he said all. It bothers me when people with limited knowledge generalize.[/b]
https://www.dikes-direct.co.uk/shop/search/1363/velvet-handy-andies-tissues
1 edit
Originally posted by rookie54One would hope that as a state registered attorney he understands bona fide, but its the way he says I belieeeeeve thats the killer, no fail, pure genius 😀
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaaaaa...
he said, "bone eh fried" with quotation fingers...
and he sounds like joe pesci...
FAIL...