Originally posted by divegeester
I've often found the Beeb to focused on the "right" issues but don't always seem to get to the nub of certain things like the independent agencies do. For example, I've seen a fair bit of reporting on anti-Brexit, but not a corresponding amount of pro-Brexit. Maybe it's the way online works. It's just an impression. I'm sure the stats would say I was wro ...[text shortened]... it's also how the articles are presented, where the links are positioned and what gets "bumped".
Thanks, that's a really interesting and informative answer.
I've found the best way to get an idea of what the BBC is reporting is to use their mobile app. You can have 20 or so feeds each based on any subject you choose* (Top Stories and 'Your News' i.e. based on what their algorithm thinks you are interested in based on what you read) are always there. For many feeds, new stories aren't updated particularly quickly, so you can basically see all the stories they have put up on a particular subject if you log in reasonably regularly. What I've heard pointed out in discussions of bias is that they tend to get accused of bias from all sides of the political divide, very often regarding the same coverage. Given that it is impossible for all of these accusations to be true at once, I agree with others that this is a strong indicator of their impartiality (i.e. if everyone hates them, they must be doing something right).
I have at various times mostly read The Telegraph, The Guardian and Observer, the Times and The Sunday Times and the Economist, as well as watching all of the 24-hour rolling news channels for longish periods of time.
With the digital age, bias is ever more easy to expose. I am reading the Wikipedia article with interest, and hopefully will have time to read criticisms of other news providers. I find Private Eye one of the most useful sources for discovering bias, although it's foolish not to be alert to possible bias when reading that, too. It's also very easy for any of us to sort of become cocooned in the news that they like (maybe 'content' is a better word), due to new innovations like news aggregators as well as countless special interest publications and websites.
On Brexit, my perception has been of equal and impartial coverage of the leave campaigns and the campaigns to stay in. But I haven't made detailed records, so it is only a perception at the moment.
*The subject must be a generally recognised one that they have tagged (e.g. arts, technology, uk news, Islamic State crisis, and so on).