Go back
Puzzler 3

Puzzler 3

General

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

A freighter carrying a cargo of iron ore is in a water tight lock of the Panama canal. While there, the
crew mutinies and throws the cargo overboard into the lock. What happens to the water level in the
lock as a result of this? Does it rise, does it go down, or does it stay the same?

s

Joined
01 Dec 01
Moves
14745
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think I know. give the others a chance reply first. Archimedes.

kirksey957
Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think the water table would go down as the size of the ship would
displace more water. So contrary to popular opinion it is the size of
the ship and not the motion of the ocean. Kirk

GENIEJML
Member Since 2001

Charleston SC

Joined
23 Jun 01
Moves
40826
Clock
03 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

Stay the same relative to the bottom of the lock being filled with
WEIGHT LOL


Jason

vaknso
The Ambassador

Charleston SC. USA

Joined
17 Jun 01
Moves
141831
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

stays the same. The water displacemnt is constant.
John

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

You lose. You get nothing. Good day sir!

S
The Diplomat

Slightly Left :D

Joined
22 Jun 01
Moves
8518
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

The best line from Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory.

Thanks...I needed that today!!

Dave

vaknso
The Ambassador

Charleston SC. USA

Joined
17 Jun 01
Moves
141831
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

AH!!!!! The level lowers. The iron ore displaces more wwater when in
the barge or ship than when in the water. Iron ore weighing more
than water per volume.
John

s

Joined
01 Dec 01
Moves
14745
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think so too, John.
Had this been wrong, though, you would have had a good chance on
your third answer, lol (no offense meant). sin

vaknso
The Ambassador

Charleston SC. USA

Joined
17 Jun 01
Moves
141831
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

LOL, It was a multiple choice question. Third choice would of been
right if first two were wrong.
John
Ps: Unless all three choices given had been wrong.

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yes, it seems counter-intuitive, but he was correct.

Acolyte
Now With Added BA

Loughborough

Joined
04 Jul 02
Moves
3790
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

And as a follow-up, what would happen to world water levels if all the ice in the Arctic (but
nowhere else) melted? Answers with straightforward explanations please, I'm not an expert
on climate change.

s

Joined
01 Dec 01
Moves
14745
Clock
02 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

north or south pole? It makes a difference. On the south pole a lot of
ice is not 'floating'. sin

Acolyte
Now With Added BA

Loughborough

Joined
04 Jul 02
Moves
3790
Clock
03 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

Arctic = North Pole. This isn't much of a puzzle, but some people still get it wrong.

s

Joined
01 Dec 01
Moves
14745
Clock
03 Sep 02
Vote Up
Vote Down

my mistake. I hate the word antarctic.
so, no land, floating ice and permafrost. I would think that if that elts
(and nothing else changes) the sea level remains unchanged. Once
the ice has melted into water, it displaces as much water as the rest
around it. While it is still ice, likewise, the lower density is reflected in
the fact that part is about sea level. As an indicator (no proof): sea
level in winter and summer are equal.

But , even if this is right in theory (no too sure about that), I think it
would change a lot if it happened, and sea level would increase
dramatically.

sin

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.