- Joined
- 10 Dec 11
- Moves
- 143494
Since there's no Love and Sex subforum here (and when I suggested it on Site Ideas I got 3.491 zillion thumbs down plus explicit opinion that it was dumbest proposition ever made on Site Ideas forum) I post this thread here.
It's a question for men. Okay, one might say that chessists are not trully representative of men, that timberlin woodypeckers in heavy shoes are better, but I am playing chess nt competing in estreme power sposrts like darts or snooker.
A few women whom I noticed here I ask to restrain, anyways there are only a couple of real women, the rest is dyke girl truck driver type. No offence intended, cheers, dykes.
So here comes the question.
What do you think is worse, to discover that your angel heart whom you would trust your life with and whom you consider real ans special one, that she also is a slut in the carnal matters, suddenly sou discover her lower lips gets down when she looks at your Richard and sometimes you can recognize on her face that she got wet.
Or, when you discover a piece of goodheartness in a slut whom you have wild animal even violent sex, s/m sex, you know that girls, red haired with so milky white skin that her pybic hair seems like art installation at MoMa, wuth bruises on her legs, in provoking hot paints which discloses her arrrs more tha it covers, and that slut shows also a bit of a soul.
Which is worse, which s better?
Originally posted by vanderveldeWhich is worse? This post.
Since there's no Love and Sex subforum here (and when I suggested it on Site Ideas I got 3.491 zillion thumbs down plus explicit opinion that it was dumbest proposition ever made on Site Ideas forum) I post this thread here.
It's a question for men. Okay, one might say that chessists are not trully representative of men, that timberlin woodypeckers i ...[text shortened]... more tha it covers, and that slut shows also a bit of a soul.
Which is worse, which s better?
And no, I didn't alert this. I wanted everyone to see the inherent sexism first.
Originally posted by vanderveldeYou really do have the most grotesque way of talking about women. I get the impression you have never had a close intimate relationship with one in your entire life?
Since there's no Love and Sex subforum here (and when I suggested it on Site Ideas I got 3.491 zillion thumbs down plus explicit opinion that it was dumbest proposition ever made on Site Ideas forum) I post this thread here.
It's a question for men. Okay, one might say that chessists are not trully representative of men, that timberlin woodypeckers i ...[text shortened]... more tha it covers, and that slut shows also a bit of a soul.
Which is worse, which s better?
Originally posted by vanderveldeI'm 90% gay but I would never engage in such degrading trash talk about women or anyone for that matter, even if I was straight.
Since there's no Love and Sex subforum here (and when I suggested it on Site Ideas I got 3.491 zillion thumbs down plus explicit opinion that it was dumbest proposition ever made on Site Ideas forum) I post this thread here.
It's a question for men. Okay, one might say that chessists are not trully representative of men, that timberlin woodypeckers i ...[text shortened]... more tha it covers, and that slut shows also a bit of a soul.
Which is worse, which s better?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 04
- Moves
- 213509
Originally posted by Ashiitaka90%?🙄 I never realized here were percentages when gay. Man you learn something new every day. Is there, like a test and you scored 90%?
I'm 90% gay but I would never engage in such degrading trash talk about women or anyone for that matter, even if I was straight.
- Joined
- 10 Dec 11
- Moves
- 143494
Originally posted by AshiitakaI'm 90% libertarian but I would never engage in such degrading trash talk about right-winded people or anyone for that matter, even if I were a communist!
I'm 90% gay but I would never engage in such degrading trash talk about women or anyone for that matter, even if I was straight.
Originally posted by vanderveldeYou're one sick puppy.
Since there's no Love and Sex subforum here (and when I suggested it on Site Ideas I got 3.491 zillion thumbs down plus explicit opinion that it was dumbest proposition ever made on Site Ideas forum) I post this thread here.
It's a question for men. Okay, one might say that chessists are not trully representative of men, that timberlin woodypeckers i ...[text shortened]... more tha it covers, and that slut shows also a bit of a soul.
Which is worse, which s better?