Characters;
- Head detective:
zozozozo
- Deputy detective:
Player
Mission;
Possible Rec-crazy on the lose!
Find out who recced Traveling Again's first post in his Thread 116213 and report back with complete 'evidence' (observations and reasoning with connections to the linked thread that would support the motive (Rec-crazyness) of the suspect).
Reward;
One Rec for every piece of 'evidence' reported. Nicely worked out reports that come after the 'evidence' its originality might also recieve a Rec.
Remind yourself not to scroll down the thread right away if you want to be the Player😉
END POST
=================================================
=================================================
So lets play:
* zozozozo claims to know the solution to the question.
Thus: zozozozo could have been the one giving the rec, or somebody zozozozo knows and told him gave the rec.
* Nobody claimed the rec, as is sometimes done (text: Rec'd). Even though I could add a post claiming to have recced the post in question and I could even disturb evidence by claiming to have done the first rec (which I didn't). So even if somebody would have claimed the rec it wouldn't stand in zozozozo's court.
* zozozozo claims that there are three hints: if we go through the sleeve thraed itself we don't find any hint but that Travelingagain edited once. If he would be as cunny as some he would make sure the thread was recced before altering and removing (or including the hint)
* Since the user claimed that he is 1/4 Ninjy it could be the hint. Tehre are 89 persons on the site, whose username begins with Ninja.
* quarter of Nijy could point to a player named quarter User 513411, this person joined late in June and vanished. It could be a mask for someone reccing threads. On second tought: can non-subscribers rec?
so my solution is that zozozozo did it himself, or doesn't know the solution himslef.
Originally posted by PonderableIn my first post, with the instructions of the game, I did not claim to know the solution. I was claiming to be the head detective, who needs his deputy detectives to find the solution for him.
So lets play:
* zozozozo claims to know the solution to the question.
Further in the thread I have declined serveral 'solutions' from witch you could indeed conclude that I must know the answer.
Bút, the game was to find the evidence elsewhere, not in this thread. Therefor im afraid you cheated.
The thought-patterns you described are not what Im looking for either. But since im such a nice guy I will Rec your post for your outstanding effort!
PS. non-subs cant rec.