Go back
Quick question to everyone online right now

Quick question to everyone online right now

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

B

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Russ
Along with all the other board code on the site, the game analysis code is in the process of being overhauled, and when it is released you will be able to experiment with lines, stepping back and forth, and swap, add and remove pieces using what I hope is a very simple interface.

But, given a choice, would you prefer :

A) The game analysis board always- l.

-Russ

[edit : Yes, I know this should be in site ideas, but I want a quick response.]
I'm not sure I follow you. In option A, do you mean that game history and analysis will be two different links at the top. So, you're adding game analysis to those links? Or...

edit:

No, wait. I get it. You'll make two javascript powered tabs, thus loading the whole lot when loading the game. That's why you don't want to include game history in those tabs but send us to a new page for that.

I go with A. I hate popups.

Also, viewing game history is easy enough from the board. I hardly ever use the analyze board feature just to fresh up on my memory anyway. I use the link that says: Game History.

Vote Up
Vote Down

B as well, if mainly for the history. Pop-ups here don't bother me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

B ... I hate pop-ups with a passion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I hate pop-ups and I don't know if my system will allow it from RHP. But game history is very important. If this helps at all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
No, wait. I get it. You'll make two javascript powered tabs, thus loading the whole lot when loading the game. That's why you don't want to include game history in those tabs but send us to a new page load for that.

I go with A. I hate popups.
Yes, you get it, and understand the issues 🙂

Thanks to all who posted, I appreciate your input. Option (A) may live again in the future with the game history*, but for now, option B stays.

Cheers,

-Russ

*I do have a solution to this, but I don't want to implement it until this release is out of the way. I will probably trial it in the future if I go down that route.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thread closed.