Originally posted by GatecrasherOK I see that, and it's fair. But couldn't they just reposition him in line with where he was b4 he played or encountered their games? Or is that too complicated?
The account is deactivated, but his games cannot be scrapped, because that would require his opponents' games to be scrapped as well.
Originally posted by mikelomMust be too complicated. I really don't understand what you mean. 😳
OK I see that, and it's fair. But couldn't they just reposition him in line with where he was b4 he played or encountered their games? Or is that too complicated?
Unlike the world beyond internet chess, here history is considered history and cannot be changed to suit those whom it has blessed. 🙂
Originally posted by GatecrasherHistory of the player who was playing the player who was banned... not too complicated... didn't you get that?
Must be too complicated. I really don't understand what you mean. 😳
Unlike the world beyond internet chess, here history is considered history and cannot be changed to suit those whom it has blessed. 🙂
Originally posted by mikelomSo the game is deleted and the ratings, tournaments, clan challenges, clan leagues, sieges, etc, are recalculated as though the game didn't exist?
History of the player who was playing the player who was banned... not too complicated... didn't you get that?
I think that probably is quite complicated to programme.
I think the Site Admins have preferred to take action that best rectifies the current "wrong", without actually changing any of the past data in the RHP database.
Originally posted by GatecrasherOK. OK. OK Calm down, calm down. ws only a Q.
So the game is deleted and the ratings, tournaments, clan challenges, clan leagues, sieges, etc, are recalculated as though the game didn't exist?
I think that probably is quite complicated to programme.
I think the Site Admins have preferred to take action that best rectifies the current "wrong", without actually changing any of the past data in the RHP database.
A friend of me seems to have violated section 3c, "unreasonably harashed someone".
does this police team gives warning before banning anyone?
I know there are some behaviors that are not acceptable but not all situations would deserve a direct banning, there are too many users which dont know those TOS and they get surprised being banned.
This although could be legal but might not be fair!
1 edit
Originally posted by Boby FisherGame mods are not involved in cases of 3(c), and only rarely involved in cases of 3(a). We deal almost exlusively with 3(b).
A friend of me seems to have violated section 3c, "unreasonably harashed someone". does this police team gives warning before banning anyone?
Bannings are carried out by the Site Admins (Russ and Chris), who may or may not issue warnings first.
Best to send them feedback for a definite answer.
Originally posted by GatecrasherBy the way Mery Christmas Gate!
Game mods are not involved in cases of 3(c), and only rarely involved in cases of 3(a). We deal almost exlusively with 3(b).
Bannings are carried out by the Site Admins (Russ and Chris), who may or may not issue warnings first.
Best to send them feedback for a definite answer.
how are you doing?