Originally posted by c99uxWhen this thread was started I think I was using RHP. Now I use TFC. I can't imagine that RHP looks better than TFC in bad lighting... wouldn't bad lighting make RHP more blaringly unpleasing to the eyes?
I usually use TFC because that's where I started, and it's better at home.
If I use an internet cafe with bad lighting, RHP is sometimes better.
P-
Originally posted by HawaiianhomegrownTime For Chess just looks different. I find that it's much easier on the eyes. I have never used Red Hot Chess, but I think the reason it exists is that the name "Red Hot Pawn" may give some people problems.
does anyone want to outline the differences between the programs? I know chess at work is black and white, less options and graphics and runs faster but whats the other two (red hot chess and time for chess) all about?