RHP Elections: Kerry against Bush.

Hi all,

I've sent Russ a PM asking him if it would be possible to subtract the number of recs I would receive in holding these elections. It would make these elections "honest elections" because people would then be voting for their candidate without increasing the total number of recs I would have after this election would be over.

But he answered that any recommendations I get will be permanently "scored" against my account. The site admins could do as I asked, but that would require tinkering in the database, which is something they don't like to do unless there is a genuine problem.

Sorry about that, Russ says.

I wanted you to know this.

So in the future you'll have to subtract for yourselves the recs I will receive in the two first posts of this thread. Sorry guys.


.

WHere's the Nader button?

I would almost prefer a "Democrats haven't learned anything from when they were in power" button.....Kerry's as against reducing the deficit as Bush is.....what a moron.....

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Wouldn't it be nice to know how the RHP members would vote in a presidential election if it would be held now, february/march 2004.


If you want to vote for KERRY, please push the <Recommend> button of THIS post.

If you want to vote for Bush please push the <Recommend> button of the NEXT post.

Originally posted by iamatiger
I see one major deviation here from the real elections - most voters will be reasonably intelligent people.

Kerry for president or Bush for president

VOTE ! See the first two posts in this thread.




Private message: Black Lung, you now have to subtract 18 from my total recs.

Originally posted by ivanhoe

Kerry for president or Bush for president

VOTE ! See the first two posts in this thread.




Private message: Black Lung, you now have to subtract 18 from my total recs.

Originally posted by kirksey957
Oh boy, does this sound familiar.

I object. The agenda has been set by Ivanhoe. Kerry being the first choice and in the first post will undoubtably get a bonus from undecided voters who are unclear on where to place their votes.

I DEMAND a different structure in the voting process, this is a form of gerrymandering. This is an unfair and biased manipulation of the voting public. A common tactic of the evil Democratic machine trying to ruin the good old American way of life.😀

unless it is a coincidence, when you choose one, it adds one to both, so they will remain tied.

Originally posted by ivanhoe
What do you mean Kirk ? Has it anything to do with Supertuesday ?
.

Originally posted by kirksey957
I meant that it sounded familiar to the Florida fiasco of the last election. That's all.

I see Kerry has the lead and Dante isn't on the ticket. 😳 And try as I might, I can only vote once for Bush! 😀 Bummer. 😉

*Bump*

(see page 1 to vote)

I took this College class once and in the book it said the one who won the Presidency has always be taller then the losser. So who is taller Bush or Kerry?

Originally posted by RBHILL
I took this College class once and in the book it said the one who won the Presidency has always be taller then the losser. So who is taller Bush or Kerry?