1. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    17 Mar '16 05:53
    He was a rustic tradesman from Warwickshire

    No evidence he ever went to school

    He couldn't remember how to spell his own name

    He owned no books

    He wrote no letters and received none from anyone

    He didn't teach his own daughters to read or write (nor his wife)

    No evidence he wrote anything (except - supposedly - the plays and sonnets)

    He is supposed to have referenced works of literature written in multiple languages that he did not speak (Latin, Greek, Italian, French) and that had not yet - at that time - been translated into English

    His son-in-law ~ when writing about writers and poets of his day ~ seemed completely unaware of Shakespeare's alleged feats as a writer

    Never acknowledged or mentioned ~ or feted as the 'best known dramatist of his age' ~ by any literary commentators or diarists during his life time

    And so on...
  2. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    116793
    17 Mar '16 06:20
    Originally posted by FMF
    He was a rustic tradesman from Warwickshire

    No evidence he ever went to school

    He couldn't remember how to spell his own name

    He owned no books

    He wrote no letters and received none from anyone

    He didn't teach his own daughters to read or write (nor his wife)

    No evidence he wrote anything (except - supposedly - the plays and sonnets)

    He is s ...[text shortened]... tist of his age' ~ by any literary commentators or diarists during his life time

    And so on...
    Surely his name being on the works as author, is evidence?
  3. Standard memberGrampy Bobby
    Boston Lad
    USA
    Joined
    14 Jul '07
    Moves
    43012
    17 Mar '16 06:32
    Originally posted by FMF (OP)
    He was a rustic tradesman from Warwickshire

    No evidence he ever went to school

    He couldn't remember how to spell his own name

    He owned no books

    He wrote no letters and received none from anyone

    He didn't teach his own daughters to read or write (nor his wife)

    No evidence he wrote anything (except - supposedly - the plays and sonnets)

    He is ...[text shortened]... ramatist of his age' ~ by any literary commentators or diarists during his life time

    And so on...
    "When a father gives to his son, both laugh; when a son gives to his father, both cry." ~William Shakespeare
  4. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    655414
    17 Mar '16 06:33
    Originally posted by FMF
    He was a rustic tradesman from Warwickshire

    No evidence he ever went to school

    He couldn't remember how to spell his own name

    He owned no books

    He wrote no letters and received none from anyone

    He didn't teach his own daughters to read or write (nor his wife)

    No evidence he wrote anything (except - supposedly - the plays and sonnets)

    He is s ...[text shortened]... tist of his age' ~ by any literary commentators or diarists during his life time

    And so on...
    His works weren't written by him, but by an other guy named Shakespeare...
  5. SubscriberKewpie
    since 1-Feb-07
    Australia
    Joined
    20 Jan '09
    Moves
    386024
    17 Mar '16 06:41
    Seems there are just as many "he did it" opinions as there are "he didn't do it" folk.
  6. Standard memberGrampy Bobby
    Boston Lad
    USA
    Joined
    14 Jul '07
    Moves
    43012
    17 Mar '16 06:55
    Originally posted by Kewpie
    Seems there are just as many "he did it" opinions as there are "he didn't do it" folk.
    Any idea as to how old he was at the time of his physical death?
  7. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    17 Mar '16 07:21
    Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
    Any idea as to how old he was at the time of his physical death?
    Do you want someone to Google it for you?
  8. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    17 Mar '16 07:23
    Originally posted by divegeester
    Surely his name being on the works as author, is evidence?
    Of course it is evidence. Is it enough though?
  9. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    17 Mar '16 07:30
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    His works weren't written by him, but by an other guy named Shakespeare...
    Whoever the consortium of writers actually were, it is not disputed that the plays were performed and published under his name.
  10. SubscriberKewpie
    since 1-Feb-07
    Australia
    Joined
    20 Jan '09
    Moves
    386024
    17 Mar '16 08:121 edit
    I don't have a problem with naming Shakespeare as the author of all the work. It could be any name at all - it's so far removed from our lives now that the author could be called "Blind Freddy" and it wouldn't make any difference to anyone at all. It's of interest only to a group of people playing name games.
  11. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    17 Mar '16 08:54
    Originally posted by Kewpie
    I don't have a problem with naming Shakespeare as the author of all the work. It could be any name at all - it's so far removed from our lives now that the author could be called "Blind Freddy" and it wouldn't make any difference to anyone at all. It's of interest only to a group of people playing name games.
    I think there are countless academics and writers who have everything invested in their analysis assuming all the work was produced by the same person. Certainly the theory that one man wrote them is a stance replete with vested interests.
  12. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    17 Mar '16 10:41
    Originally posted by FMF
    He was a rustic tradesman from Warwickshire

    No evidence he ever went to school

    He couldn't remember how to spell his own name

    He owned no books

    He wrote no letters and received none from anyone

    He didn't teach his own daughters to read or write (nor his wife)

    No evidence he wrote anything (except - supposedly - the plays and sonnets)

    He is s ...[text shortened]... tist of his age' ~ by any literary commentators or diarists during his life time

    And so on...
    My own opinion is that he was a producer/director.
    A Spielberg of his time.
    Probably re-wrote many of "his" plays as they were performed.
    I think we can safely say he was "responsible" for the plays.
  13. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    18 Mar '16 00:191 edit
    Stephen Fry went back in time with a Cambridge University time machine and planted them. 🙄
  14. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    19 Mar '16 00:54
    Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
    Stephen Fry went back in time with a Cambridge University time machine and planted them. 🙄
    Planted them? He wrote them!
  15. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    19 Mar '16 01:19
    Who is Shakespeare?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree