- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 20177
@drewnogal saidBring her back and charge her on terrorism offences.
Seems she’s just lost her appeal against having her British citizenship removed.
Still considered a risk to national security.
@a-unique-nickname saidI wonder how many years she might get? In view of her being considered still a child at the age she was radicalised I think she’d be treated more leniently.
Bring her back and charge her on terrorism offences.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 20177
@drewnogal saidI don't think so, 15-20 years and with a lot of psychological therapy.
I wonder how many years she might get? In view of her being considered still a child at the age she was radicalised I think she’d be treated more leniently.
@a-unique-nickname saidSo she’ll otherwise continue to be stateless and condemned to living in Al-Hawl refugee camp, Syria.
I don't think so, 15-20 years and with a lot of psychological therapy.
[Begum has been backed by nearly £250,000 of legal aid as of August 2021 to bring the action as she has no financial means to support her case, according to a Freedom of Information request.]
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@drewnogal saidShe's an adult now and not going back on any of her previous opinions.
I wonder how many years she might get? In view of her being considered still a child at the age she was radicalised I think she’d be treated more leniently.
She's a danger to the country and more importantly: she continues, as an adult, to be a danger to the country. Why should the UK accept that?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 04
- Moves
- 193439
@shallow-blue saidDid I read she lost her citizenship appeal on Friday?🤔
She's an adult now and not going back on any of her previous opinions.
She's a danger to the country and more importantly: she continues, as an adult, to be a danger to the country. Why should the UK accept that?
@shallow-blue saidI get what you're saying, she’s continued to live among the wives and families who were a part of ISIS so could her ideology have changed that much? She did look very westernised in her BBC documentaries; dressed in jeans, sun glasses, long flowing hair and a floppy sun hat, as if trying to look like she had changed.
She's an adult now and not going back on any of her previous opinions.
She's a danger to the country and more importantly: she continues, as an adult, to be a danger to the country. Why should the UK accept that?
