Originally posted by AThousandYoungl am open to others being part of my victory (assuming l am part of the victory!)
[b]Others might not have such lofty ambitions as you ATY but that if reality - there are bit players and major players.
Like I said - they're insignificant; at least, they are while on your side. That's the way you want it, right?[/b]
None are insignificant in the eyes of the merchant for they all have their worth. Even the enemy is significant.
Originally posted by nook7Yes. Their worth is 1/7th as much as a real ally's would be, as 7 of them are sharing one victory slot.
l am open to others being part of my victory (assuming l am part of the victory!)
None are insignificant in the eyes of the merchant for they all have their worth. Even the enemy is significant.
1 edit
Originally posted by eagles54What are you talking about? I helped you get in the game in the first place! And I shared recon with you until a few turns ago! You're playing as stupidly as you did in MD; I guess some people never learn.
You, just like the other "warrior" who disrespects those of us who have not played the game as you see fit, are not nearly as clever as you believe. I think the phrase that pertains here is "Too smart by half." Yes, that's the One.
Here's an interesting tidbit to chew on for you and those unfortunate enough to have allied with you: it's [i/]your[/ ...[text shortened]... ld be interested in hearing about it as they peer down the wrong end of Masamune steel...
Originally posted by PalynkaThe chances of those allied with Uesugi and the Monks winning is zero; they intend to declare together. Do you think that you can beg them for third place in a coalition? They have no need of you and are only 146 Gold Province Value away from a two clan victory.
Really? Higher than the chances of those allied with Uesugi and the Monks?
Either way, your critique of such allies flies back in your face.
Originally posted by nook7That's baloney. You and Uesugi had every intention of attacking Kyushu after you were done in Honshu. Why pathetically lie? No policy of mine would have changed that.
l know - l helped him win NE (a fact he conviently seems to forget)
l wasn't referring to the Hosokawa as that war did not involve me. l understand your role there.
l am referring to the constant verbal attacks on me and my vassals and allies that have alienated your alliance to every other nation in the game. This has been the most eefective method yet ...[text shortened]... Which quality do you think is more important in an overall success? (note rhetorical question)
Originally posted by no1marauderI think they'll play until all opposing factions are destroyed. Unless you all quit early, I'd say I have a chance. Even if there is just a probability that I am right, I still have a chance.
The chances of those allied with Uesugi and the Monks winning is zero; they intend to declare together. Do you think that you can beg them for third place in a coalition? They have no need of you and are only 146 Gold Province Value away from a two clan victory.
You have none and it pains you.
Originally posted by no1marauderInteresting when you decide what Lord Uesugi and l are doing.
The chances of those allied with Uesugi and the Monks winning is zero; they intend to declare together. Do you think that you can beg them for third place in a coalition? They have no need of you and are only 146 Gold Province Value away from a two clan victory.
Please tell me how you come by this information that l myself have not been privy too?
Originally posted by no1marauderWrong. l did not have every intention.
That's baloney. You and Uesugi had every intention of attacking Kyushu after you were done in Honshu. Why pathetically lie? No policy of mine would have changed that.
l wanted to take Kyushu by having you internally fight and me allign with the most worthy. And have you all become vasslas for a quick win.
You guys chose to fight in Shikoku thus bringing in the Uesugi.
Originally posted by nook7These are lies (again). You had every chance to win in NE but miserably blundered against a bot. The agreement I made was kept to the letter and if you had had more GPV than Sweden when we reached the level to claim victory, I would have claimed victory with you. If you and Sweden had reached that level before me and one of you, the two of you would have declared victory. That's what was agreed. You had your chance to win but blew it. And it that game, it was 3 nations against 4 and it was Prussia and Sweden that defeated the strongest enemy nation, France. And I sent more forces to help YOU then you ever sent to help me.
You are mostly correct.
l also knew that Sweden was (is) his blood relative while l am an unknown. And this meant the chances of me being in a win were slim.
l also knew that when he was getting very strong l could attack him and at least slow his win and let others get back into it (which is what your little alliance is trying to do in this game)
H ...[text shortened]... so if you guys stop your senseless and in No1's case hypocritical attitude we can finish this.
You can't seem to make up your mind; last post you were claiming it was only my "attention" that caused all your lackeys and vassals to join your war against Kyushu. Now it's just them being true "allies"!
Originally posted by PalynkaMaybe you should read their posts from earlier today where they talk about finishing the game by Christmas.
I think they'll play until all opposing factions are destroyed. Unless you all quit early, I'd say I have a chance. Even if there is just a probability that I am right, I still have a chance.
You have none and it pains you.
Originally posted by nook7No, the Hokosawa chose to attack the Otomo on Shikoku. As soon as he could, Uesugi sided with the Hokosawa. And as soon as you could, you indicated you would back the Uesugi.
Wrong. l did not have every intention.
l wanted to take Kyushu by having you internally fight and me allign with the most worthy. And have you all become vasslas for a quick win.
You guys chose to fight in Shikoku thus bringing in the Uesugi.
Tell the truth.
Originally posted by no1marauderYes, I did play stupidly in MD, but that's what rookies do sometimes. I'm over it.
What are you talking about? I helped you get in the game in the first place! And I shared recon with you until a few turns ago! You're playing as stupidly as you did in MD; I guess some people never learn.
You didn't help me get into the game aside from transferring an email address to the GM; let's look at it this way: I helped you out by taking over for your nephew in a timely manner. And speaking of stupid, you don't recall your non-response to me when I offered to continue as an ally to you in your nephew's stead? Of course you don't. You forget those things so conveniently. And sharing recon? Oh, I owe you such a debt of gratitude, allowing you to track mine and my allies whereabouts. Let me bow to you, Honorable No. One.
I agree with you on this point: some people don't learn.