@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidDear Sir, perhaps you shouldn't read any my posts if you find them nauseating.
No. I am asking who are you to judge other posters apparently bad behaviour when you have seemingly no control of your own bad posting, which has become frequent and nauseating?
If you somehow find my posts controlling, perhaps there is an indirect lesson to be learned there.
Thank goodness you are more refined (to some extent) than our Canadian friend.
3 edits
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidAnd who are you to ask, Mr Judgy Owl-Pants?
No. I am asking who are you to judge other posters apparently bad behaviour when you have seemingly no control of your own bad posting, which has become frequent and nauseating?
On my side, I'd rather just play in the forums without your protégé harassing me for having the wrong ideas based on her scanty notions re: my demographics.
And on the other side, I have noticed that you yourself don't mind being a crutch-kicker when it comes to someone else's beneficial and sustaining beliefs.
Also: if Suzianne says she doesn't need male defenders, then why are so many males defending her? Isn't that disrespectful?
@Arkturos said'The bot is strong with this one.'
And who are you to ask, Mr Judgy Owl-Pants?
On my side, I'd rather just play in the forums without your protégé harassing me for having the wrong ideas based on her scanty notions re: my demographics.
And on the other side, I have noticed that you yourself don't mind being a crutch-kicker when it comes to someone else's beneficial and sustaining beliefs.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidWell, that might have something to do with the temporal retro-propagation.
'The bot is strong with this one.'
1 edit
@Arkturos saidWhy does anyone defend anyone?
And who are you to ask, Mr Judgy Owl-Pants?
On my side, I'd rather just play in the forums without your protégé harassing me for having the wrong ideas based on her scanty notions re: my demographics.
And on the other side, I have noticed that you yourself don't mind being a crutch-kicker when it comes to someone else's beneficial and sustaining beliefs.
Also: if Su ...[text shortened]... she doesn't need male defenders, then why are so many males defending her? Isn't that disrespectful?
Because they agree with them. Tell me I'm wrong. You'd be wrong, but go ahead.
Try to keep your overweening irony to yourself, though.
@Arkturos saidI've decided that what you probably need is a good slap to wake you up and bring you back to reality.
Dear Sir, perhaps you shouldn't read any my posts if you find them nauseating.
If you somehow find my posts controlling, perhaps there is an indirect lesson to be learned there.
Thank goodness you are more refined (to some extent) than our Canadian friend.
@Arkturos saidPeople who try to tame me often lose the function of a joint or two.
Well, @diver, I disagree. Has anyone considered that I might be helping @Suzianne with my opposition to her erstwhile bad behavior? (which admittedly seems to have improved in recent days)
And it's not as if I have been trying to "tame" her -- which I'd agree would be disrespectful -- although some might see it that way.
At least temporarily.
You know, you could always just stop talking to me, I wouldn't try to prevent that at all.
@Arkturos saidOkay, now you're boring me.
My objections to @Suzianne's behavior (which are many) could be reduced to this:
That in trying to "make more space" for non-hetero-whatevers, she attempts to close down any nuanced discussions, even among other rainbow/alphabet people, despite being only vaguely one herself.
Further, she often only offers low-effort sarcastic quips and barbs and dismissive phrases suc ...[text shortened]... smissing or excluding others in the same demographics, then I think she's hurting more than helping.
There's plenty wrong here, but I put too much energy into you already.
You're quite the idiot if you think I am only "vaguely" LGBTQ myself.
But as one, I understand the value of "allies". You, quite apparently, do not.
@Arkturos saidYou bring it on yourself, buckwheat.
To reply in a more practical sense, there would probably be more than three items in whatever compilation I sent to Russ (even if only from the past thirty days), and I imagine they would go directly to him instead of being filtered or handled by the anonymous moderators.
Which is not to say that I'm completely against Suzi or would hope she got bumped from the site, but I'm not willing to accept her antagonism, either.