Originally posted by shavixmirI agree, part of the appeal of this international site is the diverse background of all the people on the site. To discriminate against, harass and insult people based on the fact that they are stupid is one thing, however, to discriminate against them based on sexual orientation is bollox.
Good God almighty.
It's 2000 and bloody 5!!! [b]2005
What the hell's the matter with you people???
If someone wants to play chess with someone who's gay, bi, hetero or whatever....SO BLOODY WHAT???
As for this whole anti-homosexuality thing going on here...if you've never tried, don't dis it!
You bunch of whining maggots. [/b]
I have no interest in male on male action as I find the female body much more appealing. Females are not nearly as ugly, smelly and hairy for one thing and their naughty bits are much more interesting.
Basically try to have an open mind you bunch of primative yahoos.
RESPECT MY AUTHORATIE!
Let's not forget that the reason this thread exploded with anger and such was because tvc15 decided to (once again) make homosexual comments about members of the Metallica clan that had nothing to do with the original thread.
The post that was removed was a response to THAT comment...not to the original poster.
Just to clear things up a bit.
🙂
Originally posted by shavixmirNo sorry dont agree with you there.
What's wrong with two men kissing each other in public?
It's just as disgusting as a man and a woman doing it.
Seriously. I really don't see the problem.
I'd rather have two men groping each others' groins on a street corner than two men punching each other up.
Surely love is nicer to look at than hate?
All this macho BS really gets on my ...[text shortened]... a bit of male to male fellatio than be forced into jaw-cramping cunnilingus every second night!
1 edit
Originally posted by Hand of HecateBRAVO !!!!
I agree, part of the appeal of this international site is the diverse background of all the people on the site. To discriminate against, harass and insult people based on the fact that they are stupid is one thing, however, to discr ...[text shortened]... open mind you bunch of primative yahoos.
RESPECT MY AUTHORATIE!
Well said HH .
I've had people contact me for games because of some geographic coincidence , my interests in hunting , fossils , football , whatever . If you don't like the interests expressed by the poster , then move on .
I give the guy my respect for having the guts to tastefully openly ask for matches with players with his interests , knowing that there are homophobic knuckle draggers out there like some of these posters .
Originally posted by Shanshu311For the record, while I'm not a homophobe, I thought the Metallica comment was brilliant play on words and deeply regret not thinking of it myself.
Let's not forget that the reason this thread exploded with anger and such was because tvc15 decided to (once again) make homosexual comments about members of the Metallica clan that had nothing to do with the original thread.
The post that was removed was a response to THAT comment...not to the original poster.
Just to clear things up a bit.
🙂
Originally posted by Hand of HecateFair enough.
For the record, while I'm not a homophobe, I thought the Metallica comment was brilliant play on words and deeply regret not thinking of it myself.
But explain to me how taking any opportunity to say something is gay is "brilliant". I honestly don't get that; it was just a cheap jibe, and nothing more.
But that's just my opinion.
Originally posted by Shanshu311A reply from a "member" of the Metallica clan, I hope it is not a case of hand bags at dawn.
Fair enough.
But explain to me how taking any opportunity to say something is gay is "brilliant". I honestly don't get that; it was just a cheap jibe, and nothing more.
But that's just my opinion.
Originally posted by Shanshu311It was a cheap shot, but, beautiful nonetheless. Lets put it this way, as fine an example of low class humor as it was, it struck me as very witty in a doltish sort of way. The actual reference to homosexuality wasn't really what struck me as funny, the unexpected implication of the jibe was what got me. Subtle... stupid... but still subtle.
Fair enough.
But explain to me how taking any opportunity to say something is gay is "brilliant". I honestly don't get that; it was just a cheap jibe, and nothing more.
But that's just my opinion.
Originally posted by Hand of HecateFair enough.
It was a cheap shot, but, beautiful nonetheless. Lets put it this way, as fine an example of low class humor as it was, it struck me as very witty in a doltish sort of way. The actual reference to homosexuality wasn't really what struck me as funny, the unexpected implication of the jibe was what got me. Subtle... stupid... but still subtle.
