Originally posted by demonseedThe use of apostrophes is a spelling convention, not a matter of grammar. Using "its" instead of "it's" is correct grammar, but wrong spelling. Using "he's" or "it are" instead of "it's" would be correct spelling, but wrong grammar.
"It's" as opposed to "its" is not a spelling mistake. It is the incorrect use of an apostrophe and hence is a grammatical error. Further since posts are semi-permanent I reserve the right to employ the present tense.
Originally posted by Daemon SinOkay, you seem to be correct. I mistakenly used "spelling" as a synonym for "orthography".
Just to add some fuel to your pointless argument and to piss on your collective pseudo-intelligence bonfires.
Incorrect use of apostrophes is neither a spelling or grammar mistake, technically it's a punctuation error.
Carry on!
Originally posted by XanthosNZWell, the harmonics of the non-hyperbolic integer tangents does bring into question such algerbaic cycles.
Every harmonic differential form (of a cetain type) on a non-singular projective algebraic variety is a rational combination of cohomology classes of algebraic cycles.
In this thread discuss concepts you believe useful in proving or disproving this, your inclinations as to it's truth, progress you have made and potential proofs.
I will try to a ...[text shortened]... lg using Hodge theory, specifically H[2p](X,Q)alg = H[p,p](X) intersection H[2p](X,Q).[/i]
The possible quasi-flux of the matricies is indicative of the symptoms of semi-demi-quasi auto-accelerating particles.
Where 4921/8342/5567 (exp 08/08) ~sec 769 +{pin} 2451 = £+++
Originally posted by Daemon Sin... and what class of error is a punctuation error?
Just to add some fuel to your pointless argument and to piss on your collective pseudo-intelligence bonfires.
Incorrect use of apostrophes is neither a spelling or grammar mistake, technically it's a punctuation error.
Carry on!