@ponderable saidApparently not (a dinosaur) , no direct relative. Komodos have been found in the fossil record only since about 4 million years ago, long after their dino friends kicked the proverbial bucket. A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.
What about Varanus komodoensis, that is a Dinosaur, or not?
My constribution on Whataboutism
@vivify saidHang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.
We'll never get to know what barbequed triceratops taste like or have Pteranodon eggs for breakfast. π
1 edit
@great-big-stees saidπ π
Hang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.
@great-big-stees saidYes, I saw that documentary, too. The term for bringing extinct species back to life is “spielberging”.
Hang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.
@the-gravedigger saidYes. I think Trump’s team hired him for his, Trump’s, next kick at the cat (Sabre-toothed Tiger).π€
He must be working in the US political system now.
@indonesia-phil saidI hate this "fact". It's such a smug simplification. As if a chicken is anything special! A chicken is no more a dinosaur than a blue jay (currently eating peanuts off my garden table), a tinamou, a ruddy duck, or a dodo.
A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.
Also, if birds are dinosaurs, humans are fish. And for the same reason.
@shallow-blue saidWhere I come from 'dodo' is something you don't want to step in. π
I hate this "fact". It's such a smug simplification. As if a chicken is anything special! A chicken is no more a dinosaur than a blue jay (currently eating peanuts off my garden table), a tinamou, a ruddy duck, or a dodo.
Also, if birds are dinosaurs, humans are fish. And for the same reason.
-VR
@very-rusty saidWe really shouldn't be having any problems with dinosaurs... π
Where I come from 'dodo' is something you don't want to step in. π
-VR
@indonesia-phil saidDidn't see your evidence...
Apparently not (a dinosaur) , no direct relative. Komodos have been found in the fossil record only since about 4 million years ago, long after their dino friends kicked the proverbial bucket. A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.
"Dinosaur" is not a very precise term anyway.
I would assume that all reptiles should be direct descendants of dinosaurs anyway. But I am open for your evidence.