Go back
The problem of the dinosaurs

The problem of the dinosaurs

General


@the-gravedigger said
Will it breed?
It already did, so, no Darwin Award. 😞

1 edit

@torunn said
65 million years ago, we are told.
Check out the Adam Driver movie "65".

It's on Netflix now.


@ponderable said
What about Varanus komodoensis, that is a Dinosaur, or not?

My constribution on Whataboutism
Apparently not (a dinosaur) , no direct relative. Komodos have been found in the fossil record only since about 4 million years ago, long after their dino friends kicked the proverbial bucket. A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
We'll never get to know what barbequed triceratops taste like or have Pteranodon eggs for breakfast. πŸ™
Hang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.

1 edit

@great-big-stees said
Hang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.
πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜›


@great-big-stees said
Hang on a sec. I watched a documentary film, I think it was called “Jurassic something or other”, that clearly showed that someone managed to bring them, dinosaurs, back to life with…whatever the term is.
Yes, I saw that documentary, too. The term for bringing extinct species back to life is “spielberging”.


@moonbus said
Yes, I saw that documentary, too. The term for bringing extinct species back to life is “spielberging”.
He must be working in the US political system now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@the-gravedigger said
He must be working in the US political system now.
Yes. I think Trump’s team hired him for his, Trump’s, next kick at the cat (Sabre-toothed Tiger).πŸ€”


@indonesia-phil said
A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.
I hate this "fact". It's such a smug simplification. As if a chicken is anything special! A chicken is no more a dinosaur than a blue jay (currently eating peanuts off my garden table), a tinamou, a ruddy duck, or a dodo.

Also, if birds are dinosaurs, humans are fish. And for the same reason.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@shallow-blue said
I hate this "fact". It's such a smug simplification. As if a chicken is anything special! A chicken is no more a dinosaur than a blue jay (currently eating peanuts off my garden table), a tinamou, a ruddy duck, or a dodo.

Also, if birds are dinosaurs, humans are fish. And for the same reason.
Where I come from 'dodo' is something you don't want to step in. πŸ™‚

-VR


@very-rusty said
Where I come from 'dodo' is something you don't want to step in. πŸ™‚

-VR
We really shouldn't be having any problems with dinosaurs... πŸ™‚


@indonesia-phil said
Apparently not (a dinosaur) , no direct relative. Komodos have been found in the fossil record only since about 4 million years ago, long after their dino friends kicked the proverbial bucket. A chicken, on the other hand, is a direct descendant of the dinosaurs; something to ponder (no pun intended) whilst enjoying a KFC.
Didn't see your evidence...

"Dinosaur" is not a very precise term anyway.

I would assume that all reptiles should be direct descendants of dinosaurs anyway. But I am open for your evidence.



-Removed-
"Norwegian Blue" ? πŸ™‚