-Removed-So you don't like it, so it's crap? Really?
You have to fall back on a stupid idea like "anti-wokeness" to make your point? Really?
I can appreciate the Dr. Who/James Bond equivalence point in your post, really, but you seem to be trying too hard to make your point.
No, I don't think this will "ruin" Dr. Who going forward. That would take WAY more than this.
-Removed-Your previous post hardly makes a counter argument, riddled as it is with picking at pesky details.
It's a shame that you call Star Trek's first interracial kiss "groundbreaking", which it was, and yet Dr. Who's first male-to-male kiss was "woke". I'm sure the Kirk-Uhura kiss would be called "woke" today by lesser minds. Yes, you calling the Dr. Who kiss "woke" is "trying too hard".
Again, my point to your lengthy post is simply this: "No, I don't think this will "ruin" Dr. Who going forward. That would take WAY more than this."
1 edit
@Great-Big-Stees saidEeeeww! π
I may be the only one but ya know what? I’d love to see you two kiss.π²π
(I'm usually generous with unfortunates, but not that generous.)
-Removed-With all due respect I think your over analyzing here.
The bottom line is, if you give the audiences what they want, they'll watch it - again and again, no matter what race, sexuality, or story line it is. The Dr may indeed have turned black … and gay, but if most people aren't interested in this, they'll simply watch something else.