The "true enemy"

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Mostly true. But was a Rusty free club, not an anti-Rusty club. This was made abundantly clear in the first thread I created.

I believe that is just a play on words goad which you do all the time.

I believe it was exactly what was said an Anti-Very Rusty Club!

It wouldn't have taken long before you'd be fighting with each other if you didn't have everyone on the same page about everything said.

-VR

@woofwoof said
It isn't if one enjoys the status quo.

One where anonymous users can post incessantly hateful, derisive disinformation from multiple accounts; all without monetary cost or fear of exposure.

What might "Bill's Little Bag of Green Onions" be like if nameless contributors were allowed to lodge similarly unabating toxicity?

One can tell when a post hits the bullseye when those who repeatedly post immediately after the post in question are those mentioned in the post, even when no names are given. It's like they know you are talking about them.

@suzianne said
One can tell when a post hits the bullseye when those who repeatedly post immediately after the post in question are those mentioned in the post, even when no names are given. It's like they know you are talking about them.

In your case Suzie Q wouldn't that be every post you make? 😉

-VR

@suzianne said
One can tell when a post hits the bullseye when those who repeatedly post immediately after the post in question are those mentioned in the post, even when no names are given. It's like they know you are talking about them.

But who are the "anonymous users" with "multiple accounts" he is railing against?

@fmf said
But who are the "anonymous users" with "multiple accounts" he is railing against?

Perhaps something he was told or imagined? He doesn't seem to be pointing fingers at anyone.

-VR

-Removed-

Because that is the essence of 'misinformed'.

Of course, some people find misinformation profitable.

@very-rusty said
Perhaps something he was told or imagined? He doesn't seem to be pointing fingers at anyone.

-VR

She's just blurted something out as ever. If she thinks the people that replied to WOLFE62 are the "anonymous users" with "multiple accounts" that he was fulminating about, she should say so.

@suzianne said
Of course, some people find misinformation profitable.

And sometimes only in the strange currencies of sociopathy.

-Removed-

As always, another question easily 'snapped out' with an answer conveniently too large to easily 'snap out'.

@fmf said
She's just blurted something out as ever. If she thinks the people that replied to WOLFE62 are the "anonymous users" with "multiple accounts" that he was fulminating about, she should say so.

I believe you meant Wolfe63 or Woofwoof that he now calls himself. I just call him wolfy. 😉 Once he has just the Woofwoof up then I may have to change it to 'doggy'. 😉

-VR

-Removed-

As most questions posed by you and your 'friend', the question is flawed in much the same way, your desire to misrepresent whom you are speaking about.

@very-rusty said
I believe you meant Wolfe63

No. I meant what I said.

@suzianne said
As most questions posed by you and your 'friend', the question is flawed in much the same way, your desire to misrepresent whom you are speaking about.

the question is flawed

How is divegeester's question is "flawed"?