The vast history of RHP contributors

@very-rusty said
I know you're trying to prove a point to me by using 'cryptomnesia' in a sentence, but it is certainly not every day language we use.

I believe everyone is getting off track of the thread the OP intended.

-VR

You should do us a favor, then, and buy yourself a dictionary.

@suzianne said
You should do us a favor, then, and buy yourself a dictionary.

What for? Is his table askew?

@divegeester said
I was looking through the various clubs and clans, and it got me thinking back over the years of all the forum contributors who have graced these boards and how the tone of the forums has ebbed and flowed in that time. The mood took hold of me and I began trawling through a few of the lists of names of bygone chess players and forum combatants. Like tombstones their profi ...[text shortened]... l and I sighed deeply and thought to myself: fuk this for laugh, and fuk them, losers.

Thoughts?

It's treacly, maudlin, and pretentious.

@suzianne said
You should do us a favor, then, and buy yourself a dictionary.

How about you do everyone including yourself a favor and quit trying to preach! We are not your flock! 😛 😉

-VR

@caesar-salad said
It's treacly, maudlin, and pretentious.

Hmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔

@great-big-stees said
Hmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔

The early 70's especially are hard for me to remember! 😉

-VR

@very-rusty said
How about you do everyone including yourself a favor and quit trying to preach! We are not your flock! 😛 😉

-VR

Who's "we"?

@great-big-stees said
Hmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔

Or was it ever? 🙂

@suzianne said
Who's "we"?

Everyone that posts here, except of course your minions! 😉

Thanks for asking!

-VR

@very-rusty said
Everyone that posts here, except of course your minions! 😉

Thanks for asking!

-VR

And you speak for them all?

I somehow doubt it.

That was my point, Rusty.

You should stop saying "we".

@suzianne said
And you speak for them all?

I somehow doubt it.

That was my point, Rusty.

You should stop saying "we".

"Historically", you two are the antithesis of Yin and Yang. 🤔 😉

@suzianne said
And you speak for them all?

I somehow doubt it.

That was my point, Rusty.

You should stop saying "we".

Suzie Q,
Exactly what I've been saying to you practice what your preach you always say; 'WE' or are you so use to doing it you don't even notice anymore! 😛 😉

-VR

@great-big-stees said
"Historically", you two are the antithesis of Yin and Yang. 🤔 😉

Yin and Skeezix?

@very-rusty said
Suzie Q,
Exactly what I've been saying to you practice what your preach you always say; 'WE' or are you so use to doing it you don't even notice anymore! 😛 😉

-VR

Sticking that sentence into a Cuisinart and hitting 'puree' wouldn't make it any more unintelligible. Use your sentences. Don't try to say everything in your head at once.

@great-big-stees said
"Historically", you two are the antithesis of Yin and Yang. 🤔 😉

Is that like being the opposite of Ping and Pong? 🤔