@very-rusty saidYou should do us a favor, then, and buy yourself a dictionary.
I know you're trying to prove a point to me by using 'cryptomnesia' in a sentence, but it is certainly not every day language we use.
I believe everyone is getting off track of the thread the OP intended.
-VR
@caesar-salad saidHmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔
It's treacly, maudlin, and pretentious.
@great-big-stees saidThe early 70's especially are hard for me to remember! 😉
Hmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔
-VR
@very-rusty saidWho's "we"?
How about you do everyone including yourself a favor and quit trying to preach! We are not your flock! 😛 😉
-VR
@great-big-stees saidOr was it ever? 🙂
Hmmm I dated a woman, back in the 60s, who did some maudlin in London and Paris. Or was it the 70s? 🤔
1 edit
@very-rusty saidAnd you speak for them all?
Everyone that posts here, except of course your minions! 😉
Thanks for asking!
-VR
I somehow doubt it.
That was my point, Rusty.
You should stop saying "we".
@great-big-stees saidYin and Skeezix?
"Historically", you two are the antithesis of Yin and Yang. 🤔 😉
@very-rusty saidSticking that sentence into a Cuisinart and hitting 'puree' wouldn't make it any more unintelligible. Use your sentences. Don't try to say everything in your head at once.
Suzie Q,
Exactly what I've been saying to you practice what your preach you always say; 'WE' or are you so use to doing it you don't even notice anymore! 😛 😉
-VR
@great-big-stees saidIs that like being the opposite of Ping and Pong? 🤔
"Historically", you two are the antithesis of Yin and Yang. 🤔 😉