1 edit
Originally posted by PhlabibitPeople follow your lead Phlabs. I think it would be good for all if everyone could get along just a TAD better.
You can always expect logic from me.
P-
There really is no need going in to a thread if you don't like the poster. I excluded of course Phlabs because of your position. I don't see where the constant picking helps anything at all. All done by the same few people. It is not like ALL the Public forum doesn't like GB Posts.
This will be my last bit on it for today. Two wrongs will never make something right!
1 edit
Originally posted by Very RustyIf I were to make thread after thread after thread after thread I sure hope the community would tell me how bad the threads are. I'm good for a thread here or there, but some have failed.
People follow your lead Phlabs. I think it would be good for all if everyone could get along just a TAD better.
There really is no need going in to a thread if you don't like the poster. I excluded of course Phlabs because of your position. I don't see where the constant picking helps anything at all. All done by the same few people. It is not like ALL sts.
This will be my last bit on it for today. Two wrongs will never make something right!
You're trying to protect someone's right to make crappy threads, and take away the right of others to say they think them crap.
If 40 users enjoy GB's ramble, and only 3 think they stink... the tide would shift.
It's just not the case... is it?
IS IT?
Originally posted by PhlabibitANSWER ME!~
If I were to make thread after thread after thread after thread I sure hope the community would tell me how bad the threads are. I'm good for a thread here or there, but some have failed.
You're trying to protect someone's right to make crappy threads, and take away the right of others to say they think them crap.
If 40 users enjoy GB's ramble, and ...[text shortened]... 3 think they stink... the tide would shift.
It's just not the case... is it?
IS IT?
Originally posted by PhlabibitWhat sandwich did you have for lunch today? Sleep well last night or did you have
I told you the thread is crap, most likely since this user creates several a week if not per day.
There is nothing else to talk about or answer.
If I were to create 2 threads a day or 21 threads a week I would expect users to tell me some if not most sucked.
What else is to talk about?
I'll answer that question...
NOTHING.
DO YOU... GOT... THAT?
some guitar nightmares again? Phlabibit, one of these days you need to wake up.
Originally posted by Very RustyHonesty and objectivity, my friend, never were coins of this sandbox realm. Now we're
You still haven't answered my question about thread?
A yes or no will do. I do know you have the final say. 😛
back to the gut topic of the thread. Thanks for your patience and adroit leadership.
Originally posted by PhlabibitSir, Phlab, you sound like Clinton, checking the polls every few hours in lieu
If I were to make thread after thread after thread after thread I sure hope the community would tell me how bad the threads are. I'm good for a thread here or there, but some have failed.
You're trying to protect someone's right to make crappy threads, and take away the right of others to say they think them crap.
If 40 users enjoy GB's ramble, and ...[text shortened]... 3 think they stink... the tide would shift.
It's just not the case... is it?
IS IT?
of presiding by demonstrating principled leadership. Crass opinions = zero.
Originally posted by Very RustyAnd that's why Phlab is a good moderator and you should never be one.
People follow your lead Phlabs. I think it would be good for all if everyone could get along just a TAD better.
There really is no need going in to a thread if you don't like the poster. I excluded of course Phlabs because of your position. I don't see where the constant picking helps anything at all. All done by the same few people. It is not like ALL ...[text shortened]... sts.
This will be my last bit on it for today. Two wrongs will never make something right!