Originally posted by darvlayNot if the TC's are set at e.g. 0/30 and 0/45 AND if a feature is introduced that allows for the next round to start as soon as it is clear and undisputed who the (group)winners in the current round are
Who cares what the time controls are? These stupid tournaments take years to finish anyway.
Originally posted by sevenstarI know this is one of the most urgently required updates - and I will make an effort to get part 1 of this work done by the end of next week. (I will highlight the round winners before round end)
Not if the TC's are set at e.g. 0/30 and 0/45 AND if a feature is introduced that allows for the next round to start as soon as it is clear and undisputed who the (group)winners in the current round are
I will then follow it up a week later with the round progress work.
There you go, a project plan. 😉
This is also a another shameless bump.
-Russ
1 edit
Originally posted by RussThis sounds like a jolly good idea to me. I have noticed in some tournaments that I have played in, that some games are dragging on between people who are not frequent movers, even though the group winner is decided. I don't think there is anything to stop the next round progressing, and these people being allowed to finish their games at their own leisure. Bring on the magic code injection please Russ.
I know this is one of the most urgently required updates - and I will make an effort to get part 1 of this work done by the end of next week. (I will highlight the round winners before round end)
I will then follow it up a week later with the round progress work.
There you go, a project plan. 😉
This is also a another shameless bump.
-Russ
PS not that it matters to me that much because I rarely make the second round.
Originally posted by Daemon Sin
It's a thread created by Russ so it'll attract users like flies to [INAPPROPRIATE CONTENT REMOVED].
You agree to not use the Service to:
Impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited to, RHP staff, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity.
Originally posted by Bowmann"Stalk" or otherwise harass another; or
You agree to not use the Service to:
Impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited to, RHP staff, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity.
Collect or store personal data about other users.
Incidently, how is your collection of everyone's spelling/grammar mistakes and record of NSR's?
Originally posted by Daemon SinExactly what is meant by personal data is unclear.
"Stalk" or otherwise harass another; or
Collect or store personal data about other users.
Incidently, how is your collection of everyone's spelling/grammar mistakes and record of NSR's?
But I don't consider this information to be personal in any potentially harmful sense. Not, that is, beyond any normal forum discussions and humiliations rightly suffered by those who deserve them.
Now shut up, before I begin to victimize you indefinitely.
Originally posted by BowmannOooooooooh!!! Getting a bit touchy, eh!
Exactly what is meant by personal data is unclear.
But I don't consider this information to be personal in any potentially harmful sense. Not, that is, beyond any normal forum discussions and humiliations rightly suffered by those who deserve them.
Now shut up, before I begin to victimize you indefinitely.
You know I love the attention you give me, I'd welcome a good victimising from you 😉