Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you really want to go down this path again Robbie which only sheds light on your lack of backbone and decidedly yellow complexion.
Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
Indeed, It could be argued that by 'not challenging' Dasa's hate speech you Robbie Carrobie' were the one complicit in its increasing prevalence, and that if we all followed your wimpy lead, Dasa would still be on that platform posting some of the most disturbed and hate filled diatribe ever seen in these forums.
Originally posted by josephwWhen I said "Good ideas", I was referring to what JS357 said. Read what he said again. His ideas weren't about "who decides who gets censored" ~ they were about people taking personal responsibility for how they respond and what they post.
Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored?
Originally posted by josephwThe forum owners, of course. That's kewpie, caissad, FMF, and
Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored?
the rest, followed by the inglorious bastard lap dog of dive. They
hold the moral high ground, deal bans and stuff as they please,
and dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
Originally posted by SeitseAnd of course you're the forum denizen holding the real moral position, aren't you?
The forum owners, of course. That's kewpie, caissad, FMF, and
the rest, followed by the inglorious bastard lap dog of dive. They
hold the moral high ground, deal bans and stuff as they please,
and dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI refer you my illustrious friend to the most logical conclusion possible in such a cyber war of words.
Do you really want to go down this path again Robbie which only sheds light on your lack of backbone and decidedly yellow complexion.
Indeed, It could be argued that by 'not challenging' Dasa's hate speech you Robbie Carrobie' were the one complicit in its increasing prevalence, and that if we all followed your wimpy lead, Dasa would still be on t ...[text shortened]... platform posting some of the most disturbed and hate filled diatribe ever seen in these forums.
The only winning move is not to play the game.
I refused to play the game whereas certain nefarious elements were content to give aforementioned miscreant a platform. If they had not his words would have fallen like raindrops in the Arctic tundra of cyber space and caused no more harm than if they had not existed in the first place.
Refute the logic if you can, French foils or pistols at dawn, your choice! 😵
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobie"Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored? "
Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
We each decide for ourselves who to allow, or not allow, into our lives. I don't hold to the illusion that my decisions about this will affect anything but my own well-being.
Originally posted by JS357What bad thing has Sietse done.
"Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored? "
We each decide for ourselves who to allow, or not allow, into our lives. I don't hold to the illusion that my decisions about this will affect anything but my own well-being.