Originally posted by robbie carrobie Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
Do you really want to go down this path again Robbie which only sheds light on your lack of backbone and decidedly yellow complexion.
Indeed, It could be argued that by 'not challenging' Dasa's hate speech you Robbie Carrobie' were the one complicit in its increasing prevalence, and that if we all followed your wimpy lead, Dasa would still be on that platform posting some of the most disturbed and hate filled diatribe ever seen in these forums.
Originally posted by josephw Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored?
When I said "Good ideas", I was referring to what JS357 said. Read what he said again. His ideas weren't about "who decides who gets censored" ~ they were about people taking personal responsibility for how they respond and what they post.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
I guess I missed that part, but I'm not surprised. It's not that difficult to dupe the duped.
Originally posted by josephw Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored?
The forum owners, of course. That's kewpie, caissad, FMF, and
the rest, followed by the inglorious bastard lap dog of dive. They
hold the moral high ground, deal bans and stuff as they please,
and dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
Originally posted by Seitse The forum owners, of course. That's kewpie, caissad, FMF, and
the rest, followed by the inglorious bastard lap dog of dive. They
hold the moral high ground, deal bans and stuff as they please,
and dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
And of course you're the forum denizen holding the real moral position, aren't you?
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
Dasa wasn't baited
There was no platform except the forum itself
He did spout hate speech
No one was complicit whatsoever except you
Your opinion on dasa was exposed to be complicit and supportive of him in one of the latter threads
Nothing about you is awesome
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke Do you really want to go down this path again Robbie which only sheds light on your lack of backbone and decidedly yellow complexion.
Indeed, It could be argued that by 'not challenging' Dasa's hate speech you Robbie Carrobie' were the one complicit in its increasing prevalence, and that if we all followed your wimpy lead, Dasa would still be on t ...[text shortened]... platform posting some of the most disturbed and hate filled diatribe ever seen in these forums.
Originally posted by Seitse The forum owners, of course. That's kewpie, caissad, FMF, and
the rest, followed by the inglorious bastard lap dog of dive. They
hold the moral high ground, deal bans and stuff as they please,
and dictate what is acceptable and what is not.
I wonder if josephw will realise you are duping the duped...
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke Do you really want to go down this path again Robbie which only sheds light on your lack of backbone and decidedly yellow complexion.
Indeed, It could be argued that by 'not challenging' Dasa's hate speech you Robbie Carrobie' were the one complicit in its increasing prevalence, and that if we all followed your wimpy lead, Dasa would still be on t ...[text shortened]... platform posting some of the most disturbed and hate filled diatribe ever seen in these forums.
I refer you my illustrious friend to the most logical conclusion possible in such a cyber war of words.
The only winning move is not to play the game.
I refused to play the game whereas certain nefarious elements were content to give aforementioned miscreant a platform. If they had not his words would have fallen like raindrops in the Arctic tundra of cyber space and caused no more harm than if they had not existed in the first place.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Dasa was baited by those who constructed a platform for his hate speech making them in my awesome opinion complicit.
"Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored? "
We each decide for ourselves who to allow, or not allow, into our lives. I don't hold to the illusion that my decisions about this will affect anything but my own well-being.
Originally posted by JS357 "Good ideas, but who decides who gets censored? "
We each decide for ourselves who to allow, or not allow, into our lives. I don't hold to the illusion that my decisions about this will affect anything but my own well-being.
Time To Ban Seitse
12 Sep '16 11:50
YouTube : the only winning move
Back to Top