Originally posted by willatkinsHow they do it is like this:
Anyway, Tony Blair was advertised here as the British version of Bill Clinton. Which would make him fairly liberal. That is why I am suprised that the British government is so supportive of Geo W. But, then again, Ole Bill Clinton wan't afraid to throw a cruise missle or two around, which isn't quite par for the course for your garden variety Democra ...[text shortened]... will ID Saddam with DNA. How did they get his DNA you say? The CIA hired Monica Lewinsky... π
His daughters defected and live in America.
They have given Their DNA.
We have his DNA now,so doubles will not do.
I spit at him.
Mari.
Originally posted by mariposa
How they do it is like this:
His daughters defected and live in America.
I didn't think this was true. It was my understanding that Saddam's daughters defected to Jordan in August 1995 with their husbands. They were lured back in February 1996 under a promised pardon from Saddam, but the sons-in-law were instead killed in their new homes and the daughters vanished and were presumed dead or imprisoned. Please correct me if my facts are wrong.
I think you may have confused them with King Hussein of Jordan who has daughters living abroad (England and the US I believe).
Originally posted by Poison GodmachineThe coillition troops have That DNA.Both U.S. and British.
Originally posted by mariposa
[b]How they do it is like this:
His daughters defected and live in America.
I didn't think this was true. It was my understanding that Saddam's daughters defected to Jordan in August 1995 with their husbands. They were lured back in February 1996 under a promised pardon from Saddam, but the sons-in-la ...[text shortened]... them with King Hussein of Jordan who has daughters living abroad (England and the US I believe).[/b]
The troops went there with it so there is no doubt in their minds they are certain they will not get the wrong guy.
They set off with it,tucked in the glove conpartment.
Mari.
Originally posted by willatkinsI believe Tony Blair will go down in American history with the same respect given to Franklin Roosevelt by th U.K. At a time when the vast majority of America felt very isolated and alone by the paper pushing antics by the pukes at the U.N., this man chose to be a leader and not a follower. Against the wishes of many in his own party he chose to take the morally correct path, at risk of his own career. I will never forget the stand he has taken as long as I live. I think this man has as much courage as any in the westerm hemisphere in our times.
Since we know everyone's opinion on George Bush, what is the general feeling about Tony Blair? Just curious.
Bill
I agree with Rebel Bob. T. Blair is right up there with Maggie Thatcher when it comes to having moral courage, unlike the axis of weasels: Chirac, Schroeder, and Putin. Blair didn't listen to the moronic masses who pleaded to keep Saddam Insane in power; he grabbed his balls, yelled "Tally Ho", and he, GW and the brave British and American and Australian freedom-fighters unshackled the people of Iraq, while the three weasels "saw no evil, heard no evil, spoke no evil.π
What is "morally correct" ? I don't recall anyone in the west lifting a finger when 1 million Rwandans were butchered with machettes over three months. Nor has anyone done anything to stop the deaths of 3-4 million people in the Congo over the last 5 years due to the conflict there. Or what about Robert Mugabe and Zimbabwe where a huge majority of the population now face starvation because of his despotic rule? Surely it would have been "morally correct" to do something and intervene there?
Originally posted by Poison Godmachinewho votes in that site, because is clear that the uninque conutry that is in favor the invasion was US!
Don't know about Margaret Thatcher, but wasn't Blair's predecessor John Major? And I'm not British!
For what it's worth, If you look at http://www.whatthenationthinks.com, you can see the poll there is 55% to 45% in favor of Major supporting Bush.
Originally posted by Bobla45This is for oil just oil, there are many countries with problems worse than irak but they dont have what irak has, to kill people because of oil is moral? or are you thinking that saddam had powerfull guns? dont dream bush and blair are doing well for them and for us people thinking in future but economically not moraly, irak has more oil than us, cananda, mexico and more countries together that is why they are there. Bush thanks GOD every day for 911 each dayπ ππ
I believe Tony Blair will go down in American history with the same respect given to Franklin Roosevelt by th U.K. At a time when the vast majority of America felt very isolated and alone by the paper pushing antics by the pukes at the U.N., this man chose to be a leader and not a follower. Against the wishes of many in his own party he chose to take the mor ...[text shortened]... g as I live. I think this man has as much courage as any in the westerm hemisphere in our times.
Originally posted by Boby FisherWhere is the decency? Where are the moderators? if this *7$5t> can get away with hate like "Bush thanks GOD every day for 911 each day" and poor old Uncle Adam has an entire thread zapped for a few rather inocuous jokes... You guys better develop an over all sense of fairness or some of us will inevitably stop visiting the forums... i know... no great loss. Right?
This is for oil just oil, there are many countries with problems worse than irak but they dont have what irak has, to kill people because of oil is moral? or are you thinking that saddam had powerfull guns? dont dream bush and blair are doing well for them and for us people thinking in future but economically not moraly, irak has more oil than us, canand ...[text shortened]... countries together that is why they are there. Bush thanks GOD every day for 911 each dayπ ππ
This is not for the oil, just because that country has oil lots of people think that why we are going after it, you are giveing false info about stuff you dont look up info about.
no way in hell would anyone in the world (exept Bin laden, Al-Qada, and other terrorists) thank God for what happened on 9/11/01, and I see no way you could even think thatπ
-Adam
its Iraq, not Irak
Originally posted by UncleAdamWell thas your oppinion and i respect it, let me tell you that i am against what happened 911, against the atrocities made by saddam hussein and anything that threat inocent peoples, i also love freedom but also dont like see someone abusing of power, everybody out of US nows the real objective of the war (invasion better said). And I say that Bush thanks because he was an impopular president before 911 the majority of us voted for gore, now killing people he is more popular!!, open your eyes, with this iam not offending anyone, just telling what i think, the same way you blame saddam i do.
This is not for the oil, just because that country has oil lots of people think that why we are going after it, you are giveing false info about stuff you dont look up info about.
no way in hell would anyone in the world (exept Bin lad ...[text shortened]... ee no way you could even think thatπ
-Adam
its Iraq, not Irak