1 edit
Originally posted by Red NightMust be a very large clique, to say the least. You seem to get hammered by most all forum users, and it's because of your style of trolling behind 'good intentions'.
Logic doesn't work on he PFC.
They are impervious.
Basically, anything posted by a non-member of their clique is considered trolling in their "minds"
Always for the greater good, eh red?
Just the other day you told a user to leave the forums, that's part of what got Arrakis removed from RHP... dissuading users from participating at RHP. Careful, pal.
P-
4 edits
Originally posted by Forum ModeratorWikipedia is where this information comes from that is used, yet the forum mods says I am not quite correct?
Rusty's 'definition' is not quite correct in the RHP forum context. Pleas refer to the simple explanation I gave.
People who disrupt threads on-purpose with off-topic posts or ad hominem attacks are considered trolls and the moderators will try to make the correct subjective decision.
So it is the Moderators decision on what is considered to be trolling, is pretty much what it boils down to I guess. Of course the Moderators are always 100% right in their decisions.
It makes me wonder then how certain members can call other users: Morons, Idiots, My favorite Weasel, etc., etc., and have never, ever received a warning for saying these things, not to mention "Forum ban"!
Perhaps this can be explained by a Forum Moderator?
To understand these things would solve a lot of forum issues better, than looking at a play script!
Even if it was somewhat entertaining and funny.
- Joined
- 09 Nov 06
- Moves
- 0
Originally posted by Very RustyJust because the information you quoted comes form Wikipedia, does not make it correct.
Wikipedia is where this information comes from that is used, yet the forum mods says I am not quite correct?
So it is the Moderators decision on what is considered to be trolling, is pretty much what it boils down to I guess. Of course the Moderators are always 100% right in their decisions.
It makes me wonder then how certain members can call other ...[text shortened]... sues better, than looking at a play script!
Even if it was somewhat entertaining and funny.
See the previous page for a condensed Wikipedia definition of trolling in the RHP sense.
The moderators ultimately decide if a user is trolling or not and this issue is somewhat subjective, so there can ultimately not be a black and white definition of a troll - so please don't ask for one.
Originally posted by Forum ModeratorLike a trolling stone
Just because the information you quoted comes form Wikipedia, does not make it correct.
See the previous page for a condensed Wikipedia definition of trolling in the RHP sense.
The moderators ultimately decide if a user is trolling or not and this issue is somewhat subjective, so there can ultimately not be a black and white definition of a troll - so please don't ask for one.
Originally posted by Forum ModeratorI have Sir, and the definition goes on, and on and on, and all that is being done is picking a section from the definition. The first part of that definition is not there, nor the part after the part that was picked.
Just because the information you quoted comes form Wikipedia, does not make it correct.
See the previous page for a condensed Wikipedia definition of trolling in the RHP sense.
The moderators ultimately decide if a user is trolling or not and this issue is somewhat subjective, so there can ultimately not be a black and white definition of a troll - so please don't ask for one.
The definition is just to lengthy, and can have different meanings, and some of it is not even called trolling. But I appreciate your answer on Part of my two part question.
I am sorry to have been of bother to you with the question. As you have asked, I will not ask again!
