Go back
trump

trump

General


Originally posted by Suzianne
Are you saying that people might 'thumb-up' the poster instead of the content of the post?

I was clear about what I was reacting to. 'Auto-sneer' doesn't really look that good on you.
Cmon Suzi ... unless FMF has had an epiphany he's obviously being ironic.

And thumbing up his post is ambiguous.


Originally posted by apathist
I want to talk about how to improve our system. What ideas do you have.
Theocracy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Theocracy.
Whose - and in what way would it improve the system?


Originally posted by Suzianne
...what's bothering me isn't the stupid ideas in your post. It's that so far, 2 people have actually agreed with you.
I'd imagine the thumbs up are in appreciation of the satirical content of the post in question.


Originally posted by Suzianne
Are you saying that people might 'thumb-up' the poster instead of the content of the post?

I was clear about what I was reacting to. 'Auto-sneer' doesn't really look that good on you.
Why not, you thumb down the poster rather than the post on a daily basis.


Originally posted by wolfgang59
Whose - and in what way would it improve the system?
Whose- Wrong word. It implies that God belongs to man, but it's the other way around.

"...in what way would it improve the system?" It wouldn't. It would eliminate the current system altogether.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Whose - and in what way would it improve the system?
Well, there would be a lot smaller population free, so there would be less people to feed, all those apostates in jail and adulterers and gays and abortion clinic workers.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Well, there would be a lot smaller population free, so there would be less people to feed, all those apostates in jail and adulterers and gays and abortion clinic workers.
Senseless drivel.


Originally posted by josephw
Senseless drivel.
Which part of the drivel could you not make sense of?


Originally posted by wolfgang59
Which part of the drivel could you not make sense of?
The part where you tried to make sense.


Originally posted by josephw
The part where you tried to make sense.
It was not my post you called "senseless drivel".
You must be getting confused.

Now ; are you able to justify "senseless drivel" in your post or not?

If you have 5 mins to spare each day try:
http://www.5minuteenglish.com/

1 edit

Originally posted by wolfgang59
It was not my post you called "senseless drivel".
You must be getting confused.

Now ; are you able to justify "senseless drivel" in your post or not?

If you have 5 mins to spare each day try:
http://www.5minuteenglish.com/
Why don't you try defending the post I called senseless drivel, and while you're at it consider the post sonhouse posted his senseless drivel to?

You might want to share that link with sonhouse.

And while you're at it you might want to reply to the post I made in reply to your previous post.


Originally posted by josephw
[b]Whose- Wrong word. It implies that God belongs to man, but it's the other way around.

"...in what way would it improve the system?" It wouldn't. It would eliminate the current system altogether.[/b]
Apathist: I want to talk about how to improve our system. What ideas do you have.
josephw: Theocracy
wolfgang59: Whose - and in what way would it improve the system?
josephw: ... Wrong word ..... It wouldn't

What sort of idiot are you?
I was asking for whose theocracy. The theocracy of Ancient Egypt? What?

And in reply to how it would improve the system you say "it wouldn't"!
(After replying to a post on how to improve the system!)

You are severely retarded.


Originally posted by josephw
Why don't you try defending the post I called senseless drivel, and while you're at it consider the post sonhouse posted his senseless drivel to?

You might want to share that link with sonhouse.

And while you're at it you might want to reply to the post I made in reply to your previous post.
Why should I defend a post you call "senseless drivel"?

I cannot see how any part of that post (from Sonhouse) can be called senseless -
I was asking for clarification from you on what part you did not understand.


Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Why not, you thumb down the poster rather than the post on a daily basis.
More "sneer" without evidence. Nevermind it's also untruthful.

FMF would be proud. Did he give you a gold star for that one?