"Two and a Half Men" vs. "Only Fools and Horses"

Which is more idiotic?

Originally posted by vandervelde
Which is more idiotic?

I've never seen Only Fools and Horses. Can you dig up a youtubular sample for us?

Originally posted by lemon lime
I've never seen Only Fools and Horses. Can you dig up a youtubular sample for us?

Yes! Will be right back with a favourite of mine.


YouTube

Dellboy set the idiocy bar pretty low; it's hard to imagine anyone shinnying under it.

Originally posted by drewnogal
Yes! Will be right back with a favourite of mine.


[youtube]dj2-OijqpgM[/youtube]

This is a tough call for me, because I'm familiar with the show Two and a Half Men and because (being American) I'm more familiar with American humor.
But even if I watched several episodes of Only Fools and Horses I'd probably rate that show as being less stupid. I liked early episodes of 2 1/2 Men because of the premise and because the acting wasn't half bad, but it seemed to quickly de-evolve into exclusively high lighting the most stupid aspects of that show.

Originally posted by vandervelde
Which is more idiotic?

discussing them online...

Originally posted by lemon lime
This is a tough call for me, because I'm familiar with the show Two and a Half Men and because (being American) I'm more familiar with American humor.
But even if I watched several episodes of Only Fools and Horses I'd probably rate that show as being less stupid. I liked early episodes of 2 1/2 Men because of the premise and because the acting wasn't ha ...[text shortened]... seemed to quickly de-evolve into exclusively high lighting the most stupid aspects of that show.

I discovered the show through my sons. Alan and Charlie were a hilarious combination with their complex female exploits and as for Rose? Such a sweet little sociopath.