Originally posted by Grampy BobbyIs this your opinion, or do you have facts to back it up?
Historically a few sturdy, noble human beings have displayed unwavering grace under fire. Many have
caved, cowered, self fragmented and self destructed. 'Splitting hairs' or a distinction with a difference?
Postcard #8
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThat's interesting Bob.
Historically a few sturdy, noble human beings have displayed unwavering grace under fire. Many have
caved, cowered, self fragmented and self destructed. 'Splitting hairs' or a distinction with a difference?
Postcard #8
Those that flower you with unwanton digress = may actually be the sturdy noblemen, who are not cowering or splitting hairs.
Could it be possible that you have a flaw?
..................................................................
-m.
Originally posted by mikelomYes, Mike, and be damn certain to make mine plural. Even the very greatest and noblest of men and women in human history
That's interesting Bob.
Those that flower you with unwanton digress = may actually be the sturdy noblemen, who are not cowering or splitting hairs.
Could it be possible that you have a flaw?
..................................................................
-m.
(those we've collectively placed on pedestals) evidenced critical character flaws. All of us attest to the feet of clay syndrome.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI disagree completely. It is the untravelled who lay roots in clay, as they know nothing but. The gypsy can find any tree to lay under, meditate, and move on un-needing of a clay. Clay is for graspers only; Graspers of only and all that they know, in hinderance.
All of us attest to the feet of clay syndrome.
Originally posted by mikelomBelieve you know better, Sir Mike, than too overly literalize a gentle metaphor
I disagree completely. It is the untravelled who lay roots in clay, as they know nothing but. The gypsy can find any tree to lay under, meditate, and move on un-needing of a clay. Clay is for graspers only; Graspers of only and all that they know, in hinderance.
for the express purpose of intruding a tangential bull-dogmatic belief system.
............................................................