@booger saidGo boy! πΊπΊ I believe him also and would defiantly be looking at an upper body distraction and leg sweepπ€£π€£π₯²!
Maybe so but some people just don't care about the consequences of the law or who gets hurt.
Some people also have pasts that are undesirable but with no regrets because we didn't care then, nor care now. Ergo...me.
All of my petty and pathetic crimes showed no regard for the consequences or what the law thought.
My rambling point is...
The stereotype of the loud/b ...[text shortened]... me would take him to Rag Doll City)
If your point was internet tough talk is stupid then I agree.
@fmf saidI'm not stupid.
It's odd you won't address what I said in reply to Earl of Trumps and, instead, just oozed a bit of your own internet tough guy shtick
I know when you're trying to real in a fish.
Instead of asking direct questions you consult your... obviously paid for book about confusing the piss out of people...and you go from there.
@fmf saidTake old questions and repost them for a 9 year old then I will answer.
"Confusing"? I am being about as frank and direct as one can possibly be.
I'm laminating chess books while drinking while watching a movie while arguing with you.
I'm good but not that good to do all of that while deciphering your hidden agenda.
@fmf saidBecause I would if I had too.
Why on Earth would you claim you would "take" Very Rusty "to Rag Doll City"? Why are talking like this on an Internet message board?
I'm no different online than in person.
I don't understand people who change when they post online. Are you suggesting your online persona is not what we would expect in person?
How unfortunate π€