Originally posted by NyxieI'm sorry, that's outside my fields of speciality. I'm a know it all so long as "all" is carefully defined.
That explanation was too short so it must be wrong. Know-it-alls are suposed to be long winded and boorish.
Now explain why time is relevant to gravity. And do try harder this time.
But, taking a wild stab in the dark, I'd say that it takes time to notice the effects of gravity. Something like that.
Originally posted by XanthosNZHey, who asked YOU anyway? This thread is about ME! Me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me ME!!
time = tyme
tyme = tyne
The Tyne is a river. Rivers have water. Water is wet.
wet = the wetbacked salamander
And of course as everyone knows salamanders are native to areas with gravity.
Originally posted by XanthosNZI refute that time = tyne. I ask for proof. I also object to your term wetback. I used to hear that all the time in california.
time = tyme
tyme = tyne
The Tyne is a river. Rivers have water. Water is wet.
wet = the wetbacked salamander
And of course as everyone knows salamanders are native to areas with gravity.
Salamanders are just trying to make a living like the rest of us gravity dwellers.
Originally posted by NyxieAh yes you are right. California does indeed run on it's own system of gravity laws. They have to you see. Otherwise the entire state would be sucked into the pectoral muscles of its governator.
I refute that time = tyne. I ask for proof. I also object to your term wetback. I used to hear that all the time in california.
Salamanders are just trying to make a living like the rest of us gravity dwellers.
As for time = tyne I thought I had shown that empirically in my proof but for those struggling with the course material I give you this alternate proof:
Now with the drops of this most balmy time,
My love looks fresh, and Death to me subscribes,
Since, spite of him, I'll live in this poor rhyme,
In this sonnet Shakespeare does not refer to time but to the river tyne whose waters were said to clear the vision. Shakespeare is always right (see suplemental proof IV) so therefore Time = Tyne.
Originally posted by XanthosNZShakespeare killed off most of his characters.
Ah yes you are right. California does indeed run on it's own system of gravity laws. They have to you see. Otherwise the entire state would be sucked into the pectoral muscles of its governator.
As for time = tyne I thought I had shown that empirically in my proof but for those struggling with the course material I give you this alternate proof:
Now ...[text shortened]... the vision. Shakespeare is always right (see suplemental proof IV) so therefore Time = Tyne.
He was also more then one person, so I'm starting to get a sense of mulitple personalities, or at least multiple timelimes. Therefore many timelines cannot equal one salamander swimming upriver. Maybe many salamanders swimming up many rivers over a period of time. Maybe enough salamanders to equal a mass greater then the gravity well of the closest local mass. This should'nt be posible in our timeline or reality because no rivers exist larger then our closest local mass, Earth.
2 edits
Originally posted by NyxieAh you see now you thinking quantum. Where nothing makes sense and everything is crazy. Is the salamader swimming upstream or down? You don't know until you look. Until you do it's swimming both up and downstream.
Shakespeare killed off most of his characters.
He was also more then one person, so I'm starting to get a sense of mulitple personalities, or at least multiple timelimes. Therefore many timelines cannot equal one salamander swimming upri ...[text shortened]... because no rivers exist larger then our closest local mass, Earth.
Originally posted by orfeo
Maybe it's not a salamander. Maybe it's a newt.
Now you're just being silly.