Originally posted by martin williamsAcually, I read A=D before The Da vinci code, and I thought A=D was better written!
Not at all.
I read Da Vinci before A&D and it made no difference to me.
Except that it made me think A&D really wasn't that well written.
Of course, maybe because both The Da VInci Code and A=d had that inside betrayal, so I wasn't as impressed when I saw the The Da Vinci code, it was the same thing.
1 edit
Originally posted by Scottd3dAbsolutely. Diverting and enjoyable stories all four novels may be (though I found two of them much weaker than the other two), but when it comes to the style of writing it's not so impressive.
First I'll say I liked both stories. Did anyone else find the writing style stumbling and choppy? I almost put A&D down because I didn't expect a good story out of such simple writing.
-scott
Pick up a PG Wodehouse book. Once you've read one you've read the plot for the next 30, nevertheless, the writing is fabulous.