Why Americans are fat and loud?

Originally posted by Suzianne
Were you not allowed to express anger as a child?

Do you think divegeester's quip to wolfgang59 about Grampy Bobby's copy pasting might mean divegeester is "an enemy of God"? Surely that can't be what josephw means, not in all seriousness, right? So he needs to explain what he meant.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Especially stuff that was never meant to be offensive.

I see.

I can't say I am not disappointed.

-Removed-

I don't think he's been termed a 'bitch', or told to 'shut the F### up' or 'a prick' or 'a bell end' or any of the other rather colourful foul mothed sayings that you evocatively employ. Meh but what are to expect from a real slithery Son of Satan?

-Removed-

In my day the question was; 'what would you rather be, an astronaut or a cowboy?'

How times have changed...

-Removed-

Double post.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Double post.

In construction? Probably strength.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
In my day the question was; 'what would you rather be, an astronaut or a cowboy?'

How times have changed...

Don't forget train-driver.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Don't forget train-driver.

If I were not before the bar
Something else I'd like to be
If I were not a barr-is-ter
An engine driver me!
With a chuffchuffchuff etc

-Removed-

A bellend to end all bells.

Originally posted by Seitse
The two of you are quite a disappointment, really. It's the internet,
of course, but I used to sense none of you would side with someone
who mocks cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects
which can deeply hurt people.

Even I have limits, for I keep myself within the boundaries of poop
and naughty humor.

Shame on you both.

Where is the evidence of mocking "cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects which can deeply hurt people"?

Originally posted by FMF
I didn't call josephw "passive aggressive" because he was criticizing me. I was simply describing his behaviour on pages 13, 14 and 15. You have misused the term several times. josephw was trying to say something nasty to divegeester without actually saying it himself. He hid behind a Bible quote and refused to explain how he thought the quote applied to divegeester. It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get. 😉

So you repeat your mistake. I bet you don't even understand what you're saying. You're just trying to have a poke at him because you simply don't understand what he said. And he's not helping you out in your desire to make him seem a fool.

It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get.
Yep, that right. No, you, not him. It's hilarious that you call him out for supposedly doing something that you yourself are guilty of. And of course, your sycophant doesn't get it, either.

Originally posted by Suzianne
So you repeat your mistake. I bet you don't even understand what you're saying. You're just trying to have a poke at him because you simply don't understand what he said. And he's not helping you out in your desire to make him seem a fool.

[b]It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get.
Yep, that right. No, you, not him. It's hilarious th ...[text shortened]... omething that you yourself are guilty of. And of course, your sycophant doesn't get it, either.[/b]

You are either unaware of what "passive aggressive" posting is, or you're pretending not to understand. Pages 13-14-15 - josephw's use of James 4:4 and his refusal to explain how he thinks it applies to his fellow Christian = "passive aggressive". Nothing I posted qualifies as "passive aggressive". I think you are just pretending not to understand.