13 Dec 07
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7143248.stm
Lawyers have once again proven that if there's the slightest contrivance by which they can be handsomely rewarded (or, more accurately, earn their blood-sucking leech-money) for their "cleverness" in finding that contrivance..... it shall be at the cost of Justice.
14 Dec 07
1 edit
Originally posted by ZadadkaDisgraceful! After reading the article the worst bit for me is the statement
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7143248.stm
Lawyers have once again proven that if there's the slightest contrivance by which they can be handsomely rewarded (or, more accurately, earn their blood-sucking leech-money) for their "cleverness" in finding that contrivance..... it shall be at the cost of Justice.
"At a hearing before the appeal judges on Thursday, Mark Wall QC, challenging the safety of the manslaughter convictions, argued that it could not be established which of the allegedly "unlawful or dangerous" actions, if any of them, had contributed to Mr Norton's heart attack"
Yeah right! so while they were stoning him to death which of course did not concern him he had a heart attack because he was worrying over his mortgage payments perhaps?