@great-big-stees saidIf a ravenous appetite was satisfied sir, you would no longer be hungry and certainly not left voracious for more food.
Why, pray tell?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 04
- Moves
- 205019
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI thought when talking about food, voracious meant the devouring of it which would mean one satiated one's ravenous appetite. Am I wrong in my thinking? 😢
If a ravenous appetite was satisfied sir, you would no longer be hungry and certainly not left voracious for more food.
