Go back
Wrong ends of the stick

Wrong ends of the stick

General

1 edit

There's only one rule for posts on this thread:

Whatever you post, it must - to some degree - get the wrong end of the stick with regard to the post it's replying to.


@fmf said
Whatever you post, it must - to some degree - get the wrong end of the stick with regard to the post it's replying to.
So what you're saying, basically, is it's wrong to give any degree of stick to others for what they post when you're replying to it?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
There's only one rule for posts on this thread:

Whatever you post, it must - to some degree - get the wrong end of the stick with regard to the post it's replying to.
You got the thin edge of the spatula there. No, no, no, the one rule is: never divulge all of the rules. There's always a hidden agenda, in every thread. Soon, it will rear its ugly head. Very soon.


@fmf said
So what you're saying, basically, is it's wrong to give any degree of stick to others for what they post when you're replying to it?
The degree of stick is proportional to the speed a thread sinks to the bottom of the page, thereby diminishing its imperative; that is unless another poster replies, thereby resurrecting the degree of stick; right or wrong.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I like beer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@hakima said
The degree of stick is proportional to the speed a thread sinks to the bottom of the page, thereby diminishing its imperative; that is unless another poster replies, thereby resurrecting the degree of stick; right or wrong.
If you're going to start with the resurrecting stuff, take it to the Spirituality Forum.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@hakima said
The degree of stick is proportional to the speed a thread sinks to the bottom of the page, thereby diminishing its imperative; that is unless another poster replies, thereby resurrecting the degree of stick; right or wrong.
"My shtick, write or wrong !"

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
If you're going to start with the resurrecting stuff, take it to the Spirituality Forum.
Why do you think only religions that involve resurrection are genuine religions?


@moonbus said
You got the thin edge of the spatula there. No, no, no, the one rule is: never divulge all of the rules. There's always a hidden agenda, in every thread. Soon, it will rear its ugly head. Very soon.
Wait. Are you saying I've got an ugly head?


@moonbus said
Soon, it will rear its ugly head. Very soon.
Or are you saying I've got an ugly rear?

Which?


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you think only religions that involve resurrection are genuine religions?
I do NOT think only about religions!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
Wait. Are you saying I've got an ugly head?
What is ugly? What is beautiful? Aesthetics. Take it to Culture, Spanky.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
What is ugly? What is beautiful?
Both are.


@fmf said
Both are.
The stirring end of this stick must be handled with rubber gloves, because the business end seems to be suffering some mission-creep.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.