07 Mar '03 04:44>1 edit
Recently, a person who obviously wanted to cause trouble joined the site, made two moves then
complained about how bad the site was. This person clearly had no interest in learning about the
site and, I would guess, simply wanted to cause trouble, which he did.
This raises the question: who should be allowed to post. People in the past have suggested that
only paying members should post, but I think that is too extreme. What about the possibility
of making only players who have made at least 150 moves (3-5 real games) having posting
privileges? Using a move count (which is already being calculated) rather than a game count
seems the better solution since people can create games and resign with ease, but making
150 moves would be irritating enough for most pesty people.
What do you think?
Nemesio
complained about how bad the site was. This person clearly had no interest in learning about the
site and, I would guess, simply wanted to cause trouble, which he did.
This raises the question: who should be allowed to post. People in the past have suggested that
only paying members should post, but I think that is too extreme. What about the possibility
of making only players who have made at least 150 moves (3-5 real games) having posting
privileges? Using a move count (which is already being calculated) rather than a game count
seems the better solution since people can create games and resign with ease, but making
150 moves would be irritating enough for most pesty people.
What do you think?
Nemesio