The post that was quoted here has been removed

In order to turn Science Forum into Debates?
What is the disconnect you and sonhouse share, both dragging content into inappropriate settings simply to axe your grind?
Argue it there.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

His main thesis is climate change is bogus, humans are WAY too weak to have any or much effect on the climate. He hasn't told me anyway, what his education level is. He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself, but I can't recall every post I made to him however. He doesn't dominate the science forum for sure.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

You assume I overlooked what was obvious in your OP.
Odd of you to do so, since I addressed the salient point of your post, i.e., you wish to bring a debate into Science which has nothing whatsoever to do with science.
This being a science forum, the topic is science.
Not debates in general.
Debates about science?
Sure.
Debates about comments in a forum dedicated to debates?
That belongs in debates, regardless of what you consider to be crossover appeal.

An insightful person would have thought twice before posting.

Originally posted by @freakykbh
You assume I overlooked what was obvious in your OP.
Odd of you to do so, since I addressed the salient point of your post, i.e., you wish to bring a debate into Science which has nothing whatsoever to do with science.
This being a science forum, the topic is science.
Not debates in general.
Debates about science?
Sure.
Debates about comments in a f ...[text shortened]... onsider to be crossover appeal.

An insightful person would have thought twice before posting.

Duchess is omitting the post by Suzanne making false statements about me. Here is her ridiculous quote:

"Seriously, man, you shoulda stayed in the Science forum where you were outed as an idiot long ago. At least they knew how to handle you there and not give your idiot theories room to grow. Moreover, the rest of us didn't have to read your foolish rambling."

Does anybody really think I was outed from the science forum? I'm still here and never left.

Originally posted by @sonhouse
His main thesis is climate change is bogus, humans are WAY too weak to have any or much effect on the climate. He hasn't told me anyway, what his education level is. He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself, but I can't recall every post I made to him however. He doesn't dominate the science forum for sure.

There you go misrepresenting my claims again. I never said climate change was bogus. Climate change has been happening for billions of years. You are perfectly capable of saying Man made before climate change, but you continue to pretend climate change and man made climate change are the same thing.
I have dominated the threads about climate change because partisan creatures like you have failed to prove "man made" global warming is a valid concern. I have also proved that PBS' Nova lied on their latest global warming propaganda piece.

"He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself,"

If you have tried to refrain from ad hominem attacks you failed because you have made ad hominem attacks on me. You are being dishonest.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Have I been outed from the science forum? Nope.

Originally posted by @metal-brain
Have I been outed from the science forum? Nope.

Are you confusing 'outed' with 'banned'? Outed just means we know you are mostly full of shyte and have a one track mind.

I post many different kind of issues while you just post your theories about how humans could not POSSIBLY be causing climate change and temperature world wide precedes CO2 level rises.

You have a clear agenda, while I post pieces I think interesting.

You clearly have no wider interest in science, only in fostering your agenda.

Originally posted by @metal-brain
Duchess is omitting the post by Suzanne making false statements about me. Here is her ridiculous quote:

"Seriously, man, you shoulda stayed in the Science forum where you were outed as an idiot long ago. At least they knew how to handle you there and not give your idiot theories room to grow. Moreover, the rest of us didn't have to read your foolish ...[text shortened]...

Does anybody really think I was outed from the science forum? I'm still here and never left.

Without even looking at the post in the cesspool of pettiness and petulance that is Debates, I had a sense that your response was directed at the predictable ship flinging from someone of that ilk.
Suzanne; what a shocker.
A vertible fount of blessing, kindness and joy, that one.

In the words of Bart Simpson: Bleh.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Wrong forum, genius.
Spread your toxins there.

Originally posted by @freakykbh
Wrong forum, genius.
Spread your toxins there.

Why don't you spread yourself all over a mountain after you fall out of your plane.

Originally posted by @sonhouse
Are you confusing 'outed' with 'banned'? Outed just means we know you are mostly full of shyte and have a one track mind.

I post many different kind of issues while you just post your theories about how humans could not POSSIBLY be causing climate change and temperature world wide precedes CO2 level rises.

You have a clear agenda, while I post piece ...[text shortened]... k interesting.

You clearly have no wider interest in science, only in fostering your agenda.

Absurd claim. Nobody has successfully proven me wrong in regards to the AGW issue. That is where you have a severe left wing bias and cannot accept facts that contradict your political bias. Humy is the same way. Aside from you two nobody had a problem with my logical conclusions except an occasional person who normally doesn't post on the science forum.

My agenda is revealing the truth, nothing more. You can't handle the truth and you can't handle being proved wrong. You handle it like a child.