Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Science Forum

Science Forum

  1. 23 May '18 21:21 / 2 edits
    "I dominated the science forum to a large extent and I did it with pure logic.
    I was never outed and aside from moronic ad hominem attacks I was never
    considered an idiot in the slightest."
    --Metal Brain (to Suzianne, in Debates forum, 23 May 2018)

    Would anyone care to comment?
  2. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    23 May '18 21:30
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    "I dominated the science forum to a large extent and I did it with pure logic.
    I was never outed and aside from moronic ad hominem attacks I was never
    considered an idiot in the slightest."
    --Metal Brain (to Suzianne, in Debates forum, 23 May 2018)

    Would anyone care to comment?
    In order to turn Science Forum into Debates?
    What is the disconnect you and sonhouse share, both dragging content into inappropriate settings simply to axe your grind?
    Argue it there.
  3. 23 May '18 21:34 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    In order to turn Science Forum into Debates?
    What is the disconnect you and sonhouse share, both dragging content into inappropriate settings simply to axe your grind?
    Argue it there.
    FreakyKBH overlooks the fact that MetalBrain made specific claims (without citing any evidence)
    about the Science forum. So it's only fair that his claims be put to scrutiny in the Science forum.
  4. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    23 May '18 21:49
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    "I dominated the science forum to a large extent and I did it with pure logic.
    I was never outed and aside from moronic ad hominem attacks I was never
    considered an idiot in the slightest."
    --Metal Brain (to Suzianne, in Debates forum, 23 May 2018)

    Would anyone care to comment?
    His main thesis is climate change is bogus, humans are WAY too weak to have any or much effect on the climate. He hasn't told me anyway, what his education level is. He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself, but I can't recall every post I made to him however. He doesn't dominate the science forum for sure.
  5. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    23 May '18 22:07
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    FreakyKBH overlooks the fact that MetalBrain made specific claims (without citing any evidence)
    about the Science forum. So it's only fair that his claims be put to scrutiny in the Science forum.
    You assume I overlooked what was obvious in your OP.
    Odd of you to do so, since I addressed the salient point of your post, i.e., you wish to bring a debate into Science which has nothing whatsoever to do with science.
    This being a science forum, the topic is science.
    Not debates in general.
    Debates about science?
    Sure.
    Debates about comments in a forum dedicated to debates?
    That belongs in debates, regardless of what you consider to be crossover appeal.

    An insightful person would have thought twice before posting.
  6. 24 May '18 20:29
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    You assume I overlooked what was obvious in your OP.
    Odd of you to do so, since I addressed the salient point of your post, i.e., you wish to bring a debate into Science which has nothing whatsoever to do with science.
    This being a science forum, the topic is science.
    Not debates in general.
    Debates about science?
    Sure.
    Debates about comments in a f ...[text shortened]... onsider to be crossover appeal.

    An insightful person would have thought twice before posting.
    Duchess is omitting the post by Suzanne making false statements about me. Here is her ridiculous quote:

    "Seriously, man, you shoulda stayed in the Science forum where you were outed as an idiot long ago. At least they knew how to handle you there and not give your idiot theories room to grow. Moreover, the rest of us didn't have to read your foolish rambling."

    Does anybody really think I was outed from the science forum? I'm still here and never left.
  7. 24 May '18 20:38 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @sonhouse
    His main thesis is climate change is bogus, humans are WAY too weak to have any or much effect on the climate. He hasn't told me anyway, what his education level is. He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself, but I can't recall every post I made to him however. He doesn't dominate the science forum for sure.
    There you go misrepresenting my claims again. I never said climate change was bogus. Climate change has been happening for billions of years. You are perfectly capable of saying Man made before climate change, but you continue to pretend climate change and man made climate change are the same thing.
    I have dominated the threads about climate change because partisan creatures like you have failed to prove "man made" global warming is a valid concern. I have also proved that PBS' Nova lied on their latest global warming propaganda piece.

    "He has had some ad hominem attacks, I tried to refrain from that myself,"

    If you have tried to refrain from ad hominem attacks you failed because you have made ad hominem attacks on me. You are being dishonest.
  8. 24 May '18 21:19 / 5 edits
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    Duchess is omitting the post by Suzanne making false statements about me. Here is her ridiculous quote:

    "Seriously, man, you shoulda stayed in the Science forum where you were outed as an idiot long ago. At least they knew how to handle you there and not give your idiot theories room to grow. Moreover, the rest of us didn't have to read your foolish ...[text shortened]...

    Does anybody really think I was outed from the science forum? I'm still here and never left.
    MetalBrain overlooks an important difference between what he and Suzianne wrote.
    MetalBrain claims to have 'dominated' the Science forum. Suzianne never has made that claim about herself.

    Therefore, I believe that it's more important that MetalBrain's claim be scrutinized in the Science forum.
    I have no objection, however, to anyone here also commenting about what Suzianne wrote.
  9. 24 May '18 21:23
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    MetalBrain overlooks an important difference between what he and Suzianne wrote.
    MetalBrain claims to have 'dominated' the Science forum. Suzianne never has made that claim about herself.

    Therefore, I believe that it's more important that MetalBrain's claim be scrutinized in the Science forum.
    I have no objection, however, to anyone here also commenting about what Suzianne wrote.
    Have I been outed from the science forum? Nope.
  10. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    25 May '18 11:16
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    Have I been outed from the science forum? Nope.
    Are you confusing 'outed' with 'banned'? Outed just means we know you are mostly full of shyte and have a one track mind.

    I post many different kind of issues while you just post your theories about how humans could not POSSIBLY be causing climate change and temperature world wide precedes CO2 level rises.

    You have a clear agenda, while I post pieces I think interesting.

    You clearly have no wider interest in science, only in fostering your agenda.
  11. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    25 May '18 14:48
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    Duchess is omitting the post by Suzanne making false statements about me. Here is her ridiculous quote:

    "Seriously, man, you shoulda stayed in the Science forum where you were outed as an idiot long ago. At least they knew how to handle you there and not give your idiot theories room to grow. Moreover, the rest of us didn't have to read your foolish ...[text shortened]...

    Does anybody really think I was outed from the science forum? I'm still here and never left.
    Without even looking at the post in the cesspool of pettiness and petulance that is Debates, I had a sense that your response was directed at the predictable ship flinging from someone of that ilk.
    Suzanne; what a shocker.
    A vertible fount of blessing, kindness and joy, that one.

    In the words of Bart Simpson: Bleh.
  12. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    25 May '18 14:49
    Originally posted by @duchess64
    MetalBrain overlooks an important difference between what he and Suzianne wrote.
    MetalBrain claims to have 'dominated' the Science forum. Suzianne never has made that claim about herself.

    Therefore, I believe that it's more important that MetalBrain's claim be scrutinized in the Science forum.
    I have no objection, however, to anyone here also commenting about what Suzianne wrote.
    Wrong forum, genius.
    Spread your toxins there.
  13. Subscriber sonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    25 May '18 20:57
    Originally posted by @freakykbh
    Wrong forum, genius.
    Spread your toxins there.
    Why don't you spread yourself all over a mountain after you fall out of your plane.
  14. 25 May '18 22:45 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by @metal-brain
    Have I been outed from the science forum? Nope.
    As a verb, 'out' has more than one meaning.
    "To eject or expel; discharge; oust. OR
    to intentionally expose (a secret homosexual, a spy, etc.)"

    No one, apart from RHP itself, has the power to eject Metal Brain from the forums.
    Suzianne may have been arguing, however, that MetalBrain has been exposed as a fool or a troll.

    I note that MetalBrain prefers to keep attacking Suzianne's claim rather than defend his
    own claim that he 'dominated' the Science forum 'to a large extent' by 'pure logic'.
    I suspect that MetalBrain knows that no non-troll here would agree with his absurd claim.
  15. 26 May '18 04:31
    Originally posted by @sonhouse
    Are you confusing 'outed' with 'banned'? Outed just means we know you are mostly full of shyte and have a one track mind.

    I post many different kind of issues while you just post your theories about how humans could not POSSIBLY be causing climate change and temperature world wide precedes CO2 level rises.

    You have a clear agenda, while I post piece ...[text shortened]... k interesting.

    You clearly have no wider interest in science, only in fostering your agenda.
    Absurd claim. Nobody has successfully proven me wrong in regards to the AGW issue. That is where you have a severe left wing bias and cannot accept facts that contradict your political bias. Humy is the same way. Aside from you two nobody had a problem with my logical conclusions except an occasional person who normally doesn't post on the science forum.

    My agenda is revealing the truth, nothing more. You can't handle the truth and you can't handle being proved wrong. You handle it like a child.