Go back
Obama:No 1st amendment rights on Social Media

Obama:No 1st amendment rights on Social Media

Debates


This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
😂😂😂


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
On my side, I think the Democrats are damaging their brand with their conniving word-twisting:

e.g., reframing abortion rights as "reproductive health"

or framing a recent Floridian bill as "Don't Say Gay" -- when I would agree that the variety of human sexuality is not really a topic for 3rd-graders.

(However, that bill included some unconstitutionally vague language about "age-appropriate" discussions of sexuality, which indicates it was mostly for show pre-elections.)


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
In the USA we already live in a country where "misconduct" can be severely punished in the court of public opinion or by skittish employers, which already indicates a breakdown of the traditional rule of law, with its deliberations and safeguards.


@kevin-eleven said
On my side, I think the Democrats are damaging their brand with their conniving word-twisting:

e.g., reframing abortion rights as "reproductive health"

or framing a recent Floridian bill as "Don't Say Gay" -- when I would agree that the variety of human sexuality is not really a topic for 3rd-graders.

(However, that bill included some unconstitutionally vague l ...[text shortened]... t "age-appropriate" discussions of sexuality, which indicates it was mostly for show pre-elections.)
Is that you, Sonhouse? This thread is about something else.


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
Obama is, of course, correct.

Try reading the First Amendment.

1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Is that you, Sonhouse? This thread is about something else.
Stalinistic tendencies to frame and control "the narrative" is something we should all be aware of, as political beings, and just as human beings in our everyday interactions.

1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Is that you, Sonhouse? This thread is about something else.
What's it really about then?

If you really are a lawyer, would that not imply that your verbal skills should be sufficient to get across what you meant on the first pass?

Edit: I'm a twilight trucker from a hoe-down town. 😉

2 edits

@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
You poor ignorant creature. I feel nothing but pity for you. 😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
You poor ignorant creature. I feel nothing but pity for you. 😕
Oh, come on, McChill. I'm sure you are capable of a more nuanced position than that. 😉

Bunch of fleas on Earth with a sense of superiority and entitlement.


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
Are you retarded or something?


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
The text of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the USA:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
First of all, Obama graduated from Harvard Law. Obama taught law. He knows what he's talking about much more than you do.

Free speech means the government can't punish you for expression of ideas so long as those ideas don't incite harm or slander others. It doesn't mean a website can't ban you for stupidity.


@averagejoe1 said
This is what he is saying. Today. Yesterday I pointed out that this alien-type person said we should not have 'disinformation' allowed in this country. when he is guilty of it by telling us we could 'keep our doctors.

He is after the first amendment rights, kids. Come over to our side before it is too late.
I would go on a limb to say that he absolutely didn't say that, you're just talking from between your gluteus maximuses, without any link whatsoever. Whatever fox news poured into your dumb skull or whatever you misunderstood from a breitbart 20 second out of context clip.


It was probably something along the lines of "if you get banned on Facebook for dumb crap, that's not you free speech being trampled on". Which is some basic thing anyone with at least half a brain already knows


@kevin-eleven said
On my side, I think the Democrats are damaging their brand with their conniving word-twisting:

e.g., reframing abortion rights as "reproductive health"

or framing a recent Floridian bill as "Don't Say Gay" -- when I would agree that the variety of human sexuality is not really a topic for 3rd-graders.

(However, that bill included some unconstitutionally vague l ...[text shortened]... t "age-appropriate" discussions of sexuality, which indicates it was mostly for show pre-elections.)
"conniving word-twisting: e.g., reframing abortion rights as "reproductive health"

You're obviously not a woman.

In some areas of the country, Planned Parenthood provides many necessary reproductive health services, like pap smears, etc. Closing a Planned Parenthood clinic forces many poor women to travel outrageous distances to the next healrhcare provider.

Your saying this just seems like more "mansplaining".