@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@sonhouse saidThe West supports Israel, you get mad. The West doesn't support Israel, you get mad.
@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.
I think you just like being mad. It's a common leftist state of mind.
@sonhouse saidNo. But think if it like this:
@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.
Israel is an existential threat to Iran. So, Iran’s regime is going to end anyway. Now, should they or should they not nuke Tel Aviv and Western targets?
And that Russia is behind it… nobody knows.
See? That’s what makes it evil and workakable.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidIt’s not about getting mad.
The West supports Israel, you get mad. The West doesn't support Israel, you get mad.
I think you just like being mad. It's a common leftist state of mind.
It’s about the West fighting a proxy war in Ukraine and then Russia doing the same to the West, using Iran and abusing Israel (otherwise the Western targets would seem far fetched).
@shavixmir saidAny country using nukes against another nuclear power knows it's getting nuked back. Targeting the U.S./Britain also means fighting all of NATO.
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?
And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?
Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
I'm not sure if Iran felt threatened by Israel; their attacks were motivated by revenge for killing the Hezbollah leader. However, the Ayatollah may feel threatened now that he's in hiding. Nety went out of his way to appeal to the citizens of Iran and make clear that his target is their leader, not them.
Then again, a frightened Ayatollah is basically the same thing as a frightened Iran.
@shavixmir saidI don't see how Russia could transport them to Iran without multiple nation's spy satellites spotting them on the move.
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?
And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?
Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
Any strike by an identifiable foreign state, nuclear or conventional, on America, would involve all of NATO. Iran may feel existentially threatened, but not by Israel; Israel does not have that much firepower. NATO does have the firepower to flatten Iran, so I doubt the Iranians would attempt a strike on U.S. soil, except by their own proxies (like paying/training terrorists to crash planes into buildings).
@moonbus saidBy train.
I don't see how Russia could transport them to Iran without multiple nation's spy satellites spotting them on the move.
Any strike by an identifiable foreign state, nuclear or conventional, on America, would involve all of NATO. Iran may feel existentially threatened, but not by Israel; Israel does not have that much firepower. NATO does have the firepower to flatten Iran, ...[text shortened]... soil, except by their own proxies (like paying/training terrorists to crash planes into buildings).
@vivify saidPut yourself in his shoes (or towel) :
Any country using nukes against another nuclear power knows it's getting nuked back. Targeting the U.S./Britain also means fighting all of NATO.
I'm not sure if Iran felt threatened by Israel; their attacks were motivated by revenge for killing the Hezbollah leader. However, the Ayatollah may feel threatened now that he's in hiding. Nety went out of his way to appeal t ...[text shortened]... not them.
Then again, a frightened Ayatollah is basically the same thing as a frightened Iran.
You know the youth (a majority) aren’t too keen on your restrictive measures.
Israel is threatening to kill you.
Why wouldn’t you nuke them? What would you have to lose?
@shavixmir saidI think you underestimate the amount of intelligence Israel has on nuclear weapons that exist in the Arab world. If anything resembling a nuke moves toward countries like Iran, im pretty sure Israel will know and take it out. Several Arab states were trying to develop nukes and Israel removed them. They know that their very existence depends on this knowledge.
By train.
@shavixmir saidIn other words Israel may have made their enemy more dangerous by putting their back against the wall.
Put yourself in his shoes (or towel) :
You know the youth (a majority) aren’t too keen on your restrictive measures.
Israel is threatening to kill you.
Why wouldn’t you nuke them? What would you have to lose?
Perhaps.
@shavixmir saidWhat makes you think Russia is in a position to “tell” Iran to do anything?
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?
And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?
Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
Nukes in Iran are a threat to Russia as well as Israel. And something like that would come back to Russia. They couldn’t hide something like that.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 06
- Moves
- 1140
@shavixmir
The only similarity between you and Russia is you look like a Gramma babushka from Russia.
Make me some pierogies.
