1. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    27 Apr '06 13:021 edit
    I played this game last night, and I decided to annotate it. Its really my first attempt, but something I think I'll do a lot more of in the future. Anyway, I thought I'd post it here as it might help out some players, by it's tactical nature. (You can just copy the whole pgn into chesspad, or similar software)

    [Date "2006.04.27"]
    [Round "?"]
    [White "Ragnorak"]
    [Black "J"]
    [Result "1-0"]
    [ECO "C70"]
    [Annotator "Ragnorak"]
    [PlyCount "39"]

    1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 b5 5. Bb3 Bc5
    6. Nxe5 {Speculative move To generate pawn fork on d4, with gain of position and pressure on opponents kingside.}
    6... Nxe5 7. d4 Bxd4 8. Qxd4
    d6 {Focal points of a8, f7 and g7. d5 critical square.}
    9. f4 {Remove defender of f7.} 9... Nc6
    10. Bxf7+ {Sac to get king onto white square with gain of tempo to enable queen fork and win a pawn in the exchange}
    10... Kxf7 11. Qd5+ Be6 12. Qxc6 Ne7 13. Qc3
    Ng6 {?? Lure of pawn fork ignored due to the possibility of a dangerous counter attack beginning 14...Qh4+. Castled into less safe corner to continue pressure on opponents king with the rook on the same file. Activating another piece, Rook, into the attack.}
    14. O-O
    Bc4 {?? Poor move. Has no escape square. Aids white development} 15.
    Rf2 Re8 16. b3 Rxe4 17. bxc4 Rxc4
    18. Qb3 {Pinning the rook to the king for the possibility of 19. Na3} 18... Ke7 {?? Poor move. King/Queen skewer now possible, with g5 the key square. GOod idea to break the pin, but should have been achieved differently}
    19. f5 {Frees g5 square. Now Two threats, has to lose either a knight or a queen.}
    19... Ne5 20. Bg5+ 1-0

    I felt totally in control while playing the game, but while annotating it, I realised my opponent had a huge lead in development. He obviously made a couple of very poor moves, but how would you call the game after move 13. Qc3?

    D
  2. Standard memberonyx2006
    onyx2007
    watching you...
    Joined
    06 Feb '06
    Moves
    27029
    27 Apr '06 13:23
    Cheers! Really enjoyed playing through this and seeing the thoughts behind it... more please!!!
  3. back in business
    Joined
    25 Aug '04
    Moves
    1264
    27 Apr '06 14:45
    Pretty typical game between 1800 and 1300 (guess) players. well, you finished him off nicely...
  4. Standard memberonyx2006
    onyx2007
    watching you...
    Joined
    06 Feb '06
    Moves
    27029
    27 Apr '06 14:51
    I don't think it's about who beat who, but the annotation, which is good.

    Where can I find more annotated games online?
  5. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    27 Apr '06 16:52
    http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/annotate.html has some advice for annotators.
  6. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6500
    27 Apr '06 17:43
    "but how would you call the game after move 13. Qc3?"

    I'd prefer black anyday....a exposed king and an extra pawn is well worth the cost in tempo....

    becides, after 14.0-0 he has to give some of the tempo back to save material...(i.e bd7)
  7. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    28 Apr '06 11:16
    Originally posted by Shinidoki
    "but how would you call the game after move 13. Qc3?"

    I'd prefer black anyday....a exposed king and an extra pawn is well worth the cost in tempo....

    becides, after 14.0-0 he has to give some of the tempo back to save material...(i.e bd7)
    So you'd prefer white, I think?

    D
  8. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6500
    28 Apr '06 14:32
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    So you'd prefer white, I think?

    D
    ahhh.......

    erm....that was a typo - i meant white, said black...for some odd reason
  9. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    28 Apr '06 16:43
    Nice job, I find annotating my games really helps me figure out which plans are worth trying again.
  10. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    28 Apr '06 17:09
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    I played this game last night, and I decided to annotate it. Its really my first attempt, but something I think I'll do a lot more of in the future. Anyway, I thought I'd post it here as it might help out some players, by it's tactical nature. (You can just copy the whole pgn into chesspad, or similar software)

    [Date "2006.04.27"]
    [Round "?"]
    [White ...[text shortened]... of very poor moves, but how would you call the game after move 13. Qc3?

    D
    Black missed 6...Bxf2+, disrupting the wK.

    I like white after 13.Qc3. I am not sure Black really even has a lead in development; his pieces aren't well coordinated (Ne7 blocks Q diagonal, Kf7 blocks Rook from coming to the f-file, etc.) while White has a good pawn center and no obvious targets for Black to hit, and he is going to castle soon. Black doesn't have enough compensation for the pawn.
  11. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    03 May '06 09:23
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    Black missed 6...Bxf2+, disrupting the wK.
    I'm not sure what he'd have gained by that. I think I'd have been able to artificially castle over the next couple of moves.

    I guess it would have disrupted my plans, but it looks like it would give me a lead in development.

    D
  12. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    03 May '06 16:04
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    I'm not sure what he'd have gained by that. I think I'd have been able to artificially castle over the next couple of moves.

    I guess it would have disrupted my plans, but it looks like it would give me a lead in development.

    D
    He gains time, of course. Hard to maintain a lead in development when you're spending 2-3 moves 'castling by hand'.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree