1. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 14:32
    Well this book got me playing 1. d4 (and some Kasparov games too) and I think I'll put aside the other books I was reading and just focus on theis one for a good while.

    If any of you has read/study it already just tell me what you thought about it. If you want you can show me some reviews too. But please don't show me Silman's one.

    I'll use this thread to post things as I get along in the book and hopefuly some discussion can get going in here.
  2. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    06 Apr '08 14:42

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 14:421 edit
    So here it is the first bombastic thing he says:

    1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5





    "This leaves black with a very bad position". Now Berliner isn't a patzer that's for sure, but is he exagerating here? It surely seems like it. But what I'm interested in is not just not listening and say he's wrong right on. I want to read what he has to say and at least try to understand ehy he says it.
  4. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 14:44
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    The System is this one: http://www.amazon.com/System-World-Champions-Approach-Chess/dp/1901983102
    I think it is kinda not very known about because the author goes a lot against everyday chess knowledge.
  5. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    06 Apr '08 14:591 edit
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    So here it is the first bombastic thing he says:

    1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5



    [fen]rnbqkb1r/ppp2ppp/5n2/3p4/3P4/2N5/PP2PPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 5[/fen]

    "This leaves black with a very bad position". Now Berliner isn't a patzer that's for sure, but is he exagerating here? It surely seems like it. But what I'm interested in is not right on. I want to read what he has to say and at least try to understand ehy he says it.
    This system is one of the reasons why black sometimes plays 3...Be7 as after pawn exchange they will use their empo not for knight but to out bishop on f5, before white places their bishop on d3.

    To be honest that system seems to be more pleasant for white as black may have problems to get active counter play. But Berliner definitely exagerates.
  6. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    06 Apr '08 15:20
    If Mr. Berliner's assertions are correct, then I would soon expect every top-rated chess engine in the world to start playing nothing but 1d4. 😉
  7. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 15:37
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    If Mr. Berliner's assertions are correct, then I would soon expect every top-rated chess engine in the world to start playing nothing but 1d4. 😉
    Well engines don't see that far to discern that 1. d4 is indeed better. He gives strategical/positional reasons for it so I guess that's one more factor not to expect 1. d4! to be indeed figured out by today's engines.

    I'm not saying he's right but I will definetely study with great care what he has to say and not just ignore him from the outset. One way or the other I'm sure I'll learn a lot.
  8. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 15:40
    Originally posted by Korch
    This system is one of the reasons why black sometimes plays 3...Be7 as after pawn exchange they will use their empo not for knight but to out bishop on f5, before white places their bishop on d3.

    To be honest that system seems to be more pleasant for white as black may have problems to get active counter play. But Berliner definitely exagerates.
    Yes. He's thing seems to be accumulating small advantages and concessions made by black to get an increasing grip on the board.

    And it is the second time I've seen you post Bf5 to black on 1. d4. I never thought about thaty I don't remember seeing it so explicitely stated but it sure seems a great idea. But for instance on the KID maybe it isn't a good idea. Or is it?
  9. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    06 Apr '08 15:46
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    Well engines don't see that far to discern that 1. d4 is indeed better. He gives strategical/positional reasons for it so I guess that's one more factor not to expect 1. d4! to be indeed figured out by today's engines.

    I'm not saying he's right but I will definetely study with great care what he has to say and not just ignore him from the outset. One way or the other I'm sure I'll learn a lot.
    Then if that's true, I'd expect people like Mr. Berliner to start beating chess engines like Rybka. I wouldn't put money on that happening, though.
  10. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 16:01
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    Then if that's true, I'd expect people like Mr. Berliner to start beating chess engines like Rybka. I wouldn't put money on that happening, though.
    It's a good thing you aren't dismissing it right away and trying to figure out what he's saying. 😕

    Engines can be beat at CC time frames. Engines like Fritz get beat here from time to time but I don't know about Rybka.

    Anyway this thread isn't about this. I'll post my thoughts on Berliner's thoughts (and Berliner's thoughts too) and hopefuly with some more thoughts we'll ry to get some meaningful conclusions.
  11. Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Mar '07
    Moves
    1260
    06 Apr '08 16:26
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    It's a good thing you aren't dismissing it right away and trying to figure out what he's saying. 😕

    Engines can be beat at CC time frames. Engines like Fritz get beat here from time to time but I don't know about Rybka.

    Anyway this thread isn't about this. I'll post my thoughts on Berliner's thoughts (and Berliner's thoughts too) and hopefuly with some more thoughts we'll ry to get some meaningful conclusions.
    Who is Berliner anyway? Why would you put much work into a book that's pretty controversial?
  12. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    06 Apr '08 16:26
    More reviews:

    http://www.chesscafe.com/text/thesystem.txt

    http://www.jeremysilman.com/book_reviews_rb/rb_systm_wrld_chmpns_apprch.html

    http://www.jeremysilman.com/book_reviews_jw/jw_The_System.html

    As requested, I didn't include Silman's review.
  13. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 16:301 edit
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    More reviews:

    http://www.chesscafe.com/text/thesystem.txt

    http://www.jeremysilman.com/book_reviews_rb/rb_systm_wrld_chmpns_apprch.html

    http://www.jeremysilman.com/book_reviews_jw/jw_The_System.html

    As requested, I didn't include Silman's review.
    😵

    Thanks!

    Edit: John Watson's review is fiery.
  14. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    06 Apr '08 16:34
    Originally posted by diskamyl
    Who is Berliner anyway? Why would you put much work into a book that's pretty controversial?
    Former CC World Champion in a time were there were no chess engines to rely on with a record of 14/16. I think he is more known because of Estrin-Berliner two knights defence were he blasted a well known specialist of the two knights defence on his playground.

    But I'll put some work to it because I think one way or the other I'll gain a lot of chess knowledge. I like the way he exposes his thoughts on this book and I like the fact that he is so icnoclastic.
  15. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    06 Apr '08 16:56
    Originally posted by diskamyl
    Who is Berliner anyway? Why would you put much work into a book that's pretty controversial?
    A few newspaper articles and an interview of Berliner in case anyone is interested:

    http://archive.computerhistory.org/projects/chess/related_materials/text/5-2.Monroeville_teen_masters.Oct-26-1985.Pittsburgh_Press/Monroeville_teen_masters_champion_chess_computer.Berliner-Hans_HiTech.Oct-26-1985.Pittsburgh_Press.062303039.pdf

    http://archive.computerhistory.org/projects/chess/related_materials/text/5-2.Newest_chess_master_a_CMU_profs_computer.Guo-David.Post-Gazette.1985/Newest_chess_master_a_CMU_profs_computer.Guo-David.Post-Gazette.1985.062303040.sm.pdf

    http://archive.computerhistory.org/projects/chess/related_materials/text/5-2.Chess_playing_computer_wins_championship.Kelly-Carolyn.Tartan.NACC.1986/Chess_playing_computer_wins_championship.Kelly-Carolyn.Tartan.NACC.1986.062303038.sm.pdf

    http://archive.computerhistory.org/projects/chess/related_materials/oral-history/hans_berliner.oral_history.2005.102630824/berliner.oral_history_transcript.2005.103630824.pdf
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree