1. c3?!

Originally posted by 7ate9
i disagree with you, as if they advanced even further it would show just how stupid some people are who try to stop it. they would give up their games and resort to other ways of fighting against it.

i meant to ask what people thought about 1 b4? pretty crappy i think 🙄

Originally posted by moon 111
why is that try to prove yourself right tell me whats bad about it

Because 1... D4 is impossible?

Do you mean 1... D5?

Originally posted by 7ate9
well, at the moment it's looking at how many best moves ahead which can stipulate a cheat to x degree of acuracy. programming computers better may provide so many other ways of cheating that it would become impossible to differentiate between a computer or not. some people would give up trying to play god, trying to stop people playing around with what's only ...[text shortened]... ple in this thread, cause we were only talking about it, and not dishing out death-sentences.

what are you talking about?

Originally posted by trevor33

Can't argue with that edit (although 7ate9 manages to).

Originally posted by 7ate9
why do you edit so much?

The end (not writing like you) justifies the means. Anyway, why your prurient interest in other people's edits?

I thought trevor33's edit was a good one, maybe his best ever. Why did you disagree with him?

Originally posted by 7ate9
because you could get targeted for it.

some people struggle there for many reasons.

I don't understand either of those statements.

(Look, no edits.)

Originally posted by 7ate9
i can shut up and let people like xanthos have their way, but one day you may find there is something he don't like about you and then you will not be able to take part in these forums as you would like also. then others will critizise you for standing up for what is right.... only because it affects you.

Does he play 1. c3?!