1. Joined
    08 Oct '06
    Moves
    24000
    13 Aug '10 20:16
    Here's a 3/0 that I just played:



    I think this is my first smothered mate.
  2. on your backrank!
    Joined
    31 Jul '10
    Moves
    3177
    13 Aug '10 20:171 edit
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    That's a narrow defintion in my opinion. The following looks to me like smothered mate as well

    [fen]6bk/7p/8/8/8/2B5/8/7K b - - 0 0[/fen]
    this would also be a smothered then



    and how about this one?

  3. Joined
    08 Oct '06
    Moves
    24000
    13 Aug '10 20:20
    Strangely Crafty evaluates 12 ... Qg1+ as a blunder. It suggests 13 Nxg1 Bf2. Am I missing something here?
  4. on your backrank!
    Joined
    31 Jul '10
    Moves
    3177
    13 Aug '10 20:231 edit
    after 13.Nxg1! your knight is still pinned by the rook so no smothered mate available
  5. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    13 Aug '10 20:33
    Originally posted by watchyourbackrank
    this would also be a smothered then

    [fen]6bk/7p/8/8/8/2Q5/8/7K b - - 0 0[/fen]

    and how about this one?

    [fen]6rk/6p1/8/8/8/7R/8/7K b - - 0 0[/fen]
    And why not? In each case, the only escape routes are blocked by the defender's own material.
  6. Joined
    08 Oct '06
    Moves
    24000
    13 Aug '10 20:34
    Originally posted by watchyourbackrank
    after 13.Nxg1! your knight is still pinned by the rook so no smothered mate available
    Oh, wow. Very lucky for me.
  7. Joined
    28 Mar '10
    Moves
    3807
    13 Aug '10 22:30
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    And why not? In each case, the only escape routes are blocked by the defender's own material.
    No,because one escape route,g7,is blocked by the attacking piece.

    Of course,if you want to rewrite the definition that is fine.I'm not emotionally attached to Renaud & Kahn's definition 🙂

    toet.
  8. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    14 Aug '10 15:32
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    That's a narrow defintion in my opinion. The following looks to me like smothered mate as well

    [fen]6bk/7p/8/8/8/2B5/8/7K b - - 0 0[/fen]
    Trouble is - what's the limit on your definition? You expand it to allow the attacker to control 2 squares, so long as there is a single attacker. Why not 3, 4 or 5?





  9. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    14 Aug '10 21:48
    To be pendantic a true smothered mate
    can only be delivered by a Knight.
    The King must be in check and all flight squares must be
    occipied by the King's own pieces.

    Most of the other mates shown are epaulette or reversed epaulette mates,
    or dovetail and reversed doevetail mates.

    This one.

    [/b]

    is a corridor mate the cousin of the back rank mate.
  10. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    14 Aug '10 22:26
    What would this be called?

  11. Joined
    28 Mar '10
    Moves
    3807
    14 Aug '10 22:28
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    What would this be called?

    [fen]3NkB2/2NRPR2/8/8/p7/8/8/3Q1K2 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    madness 😀

    toet.
  12. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    14 Aug '10 23:021 edit
    Hi amolv

    Yes you rode your luck. The mating pattern took over the mind.
    Often happens in Blitz with mixed results.
    I think most of us have played a blitz combination only to find the
    critical piece is pinned.



    1.NxQ wins. He played 1.RxQ and was mated.

    Witness your chums playing C.C. who where not so lucky.

    Afriend - PML RHP 2007

    Black to play.



    Black can play Nf2+ or QxN but the chance to play the
    smothered mate could not be resisted.

    He played 1....Qg1+ 2.KxQ



    OOPS! 1-0

    At times like this you wish you could see the guys face
    when he logged on and saw the move 2.KxQ.

    This one is worse.

    pradtf - fredryck RHP 2002.

    White to play



    White has mate in 4 starting with 1.Nf7+

    He played 1.Qg8+



    Looks good. 1...RxQ 2.Nf7 Mate or 1...NxQ 2.Nf7 Mate.

    Black played 1....KxQ 0-1
  13. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    15 Aug '10 04:40
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    What would this be called?

    [fen]3NkB2/2NRPR2/8/8/p7/8/8/3Q1K2 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    A total ass-kicking 😀
  14. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    15 Aug '10 13:193 edits
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    What would this be called?

    [fen]3NkB2/2NRPR2/8/8/p7/8/8/3Q1K2 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    🙂

    All the flight squares in your posted example are covered by
    protected White pieces.

    In a genuine Smothered Mate all flight squares must be covered
    by the mated King's own pieces.

    Please allow me to demonstrate using your example.

  15. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    15 Aug '10 14:34
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    🙂

    All the flight squares in your posted example are covered by
    protected White pieces.

    In a genuine Smothered Mate all flight squares must be covered
    by the mated King's own pieces.

    Please allow me to demonstrate using your example.

    Hey, where'd that extra white knight go, up your sleeve? 🙂

    -------------------------------------




    I guess my real question is, why should it matter who's doing the smothering, as long as the king is smothered? Maybe this could be a "two-tone" smothered mate, or a "rainbow" smothered mate (okay, a rainbow of very limited colors). It seems to me the traditional definition is really a "self-smothered" mate.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree