13 Aug '10 20:16>
Here's a 3/0 that I just played:
I think this is my first smothered mate.
I think this is my first smothered mate.
Originally posted by Mephisto2No,because one escape route,g7,is blocked by the attacking piece.
And why not? In each case, the only escape routes are blocked by the defender's own material.
Originally posted by Mephisto2Trouble is - what's the limit on your definition? You expand it to allow the attacker to control 2 squares, so long as there is a single attacker. Why not 3, 4 or 5?
That's a narrow defintion in my opinion. The following looks to me like smothered mate as well
[fen]6bk/7p/8/8/8/2B5/8/7K b - - 0 0[/fen]
Originally posted by Mad Rook🙂
What would this be called?
[fen]3NkB2/2NRPR2/8/8/p7/8/8/3Q1K2 b - - 0 1[/fen]
Originally posted by greenpawn34Hey, where'd that extra white knight go, up your sleeve? 🙂
🙂
All the flight squares in your posted example are covered by
protected White pieces.
In a genuine Smothered Mate all flight squares must be covered
by the mated King's own pieces.
Please allow me to demonstrate using your example.