Originally posted by deeploserWaitzkin!? He never even made GM...
I haven't been into chess until late last year. So far my favorite players are Josh Waitzkin because he started young and I'm trying to get my 7 year old interested in chess and that he and I are around the same age. My other favorite is Paul Morphy because he also started young and is from the same state I'm from.
Anyhow, my favorite is Tal, followed by Fischer.
Originally posted by briancronA very nice way of putting it. It's very difficult to say how good Morphy was because no-one in his day good push him to his limits. I'm not interested in how many amateurs a master can beat, blindfold or otherwise.
I think it's a compliment to Morphy that someone would say he only beat up on weak players...
their arms were too short to box with god
Alekhine managed to wrest the title away from a supremely talented player and Fischer proved himself to be in a different class to the finest Soviet player of the 1960s, surely these achievments are more impressive than beating up a duke and a count in an opera box?
Originally posted by onyx2006Yes I know he was - he was also meant to be very good - & a natural at 'Go' too - just an all-round games guy, I guess. I think he was once on the front cover of 'Chess Magazine' and maybe also had some role within an official chess organization to boot?
seriously, steve was an avid player. He played the giuoco piano, ask him.
Peter Svidler's my favourite snooker player, btw.