Go back
Analyse please

Analyse please

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Game 2473187

I'm no chess brain, so someone help me out please. . .where did i screw up ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Move 18 is an en prise blunder, but in the moves running up to it you created a backward pawn on e6 defended by a minor piece which was bound to be repelled at some point.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

maybe 18...Nf4??

after closer look I am sure that game was a joke.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
Game 2473187

I'm no chess brain, so someone help me out please. . .where did i screw up ?
19.c6?? trapping your bishop.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

18 ...Rae8 would probably have led to equality for the time being. c6 doesn't look so bad when you see the combination which follows.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Besides blundering the two pieces, which basically is whole thing with this game, your opening play leaves something to be desired also. ..Nc6, blocking your c-pawn, doesn't seem like a good idea, and ..Bb4, which should have been immediately met by c3, just gives White c3 for free. Also, playing f5, leaving the e6 pawn backward on an open file, is a problem, especially after you play ..b6 and ..b7, removing the only defender of that bad pawn. But obviously moving your knight to an unprotected square and trapping your bishop are the two major problems with this game.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
18 ...Rae8 would probably have led to equality for the time being. c6 doesn't look so bad when you see the combination which follows.
but instead of taking the bishop his opponent could have played Rf2.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jusuh
maybe 18...Nf4??

after closer look I am sure that game was a joke.
No, I think it was a real game.

I agree with everything that people have said. Nc6 was weak. Hanging pieces all over the place.

What really struck me is that we arrive at move 30, after a series of dropped pieces and bad sacrifices with, amazingly, material equality.

At that point you played Qxb2 losing the game. Either Rd8 or,even better Rh8, left you with a lead in the game.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
but instead of taking the bishop his opponent could have played Rf2.
Yes, it's bad, but it's not where he lost the game - even there you're only looking at a point difference, and the imbalance plus the possibilities of that f-file don't write off Black's chances entirely.

20 Rf2 Bxf3
21 Rxf3 Qxd4+
22 Qf2

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
Yes, it's bad, but it's not where he lost the game - even there you're only looking at a point difference, and the imbalance plus the possibilities of that f-file don't write off Black's chances entirely.

20 Rf2 Bxf3
21 Rxf3 Qxd4+
22 Qf2
no 20...Bxf3 21.Rf2

Vote Up
Vote Down

Move 18 was a bit of a plum move, that's for sure. 😳

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
no 20...Bxf3 21.Rf2
21 ...Bh5

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
21 ...Bh5
so white still has an extra piece.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
so white still has an extra piece.
Yes, I already said that - move 18 was where the game was lost, in and of itself move 19 is far from irretrievable.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I seem to be really good at losing well 😕, or so it seems from the feedback from other players. It's making that leap from well fought battle to well fought victory, that seems to be the problem.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.