1. Hinesville, GA
    Joined
    17 Aug '05
    Moves
    12481
    03 May '06 22:22
    This was a very crystal clear rook sacrifice for a position. I hope people like it. I'm rather proud of this little gem. My opponent just resigned today. Of course his rating wasn't that high, but I think the game has a classical beauty to it, and a tinge of Tal somewhere I feel. Only, Tal's sacrifices were often much deeper. 🙂 Game 1770026
  2. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    03 May '06 22:48

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. Standard memberShallowBlue
    Bah Humbug!
    C:\Drive
    Joined
    28 Feb '04
    Moves
    13274
    03 May '06 22:49
    Originally posted by powershaker
    This was a very crystal clear rook sacrifice for a position. I hope people like it. I'm rather proud of this little gem. My opponent just resigned today. Of course his rating wasn't that high, but I think the game has a classical beauty to it, and a tinge of Tal somewhere I feel. Only, Tal's sacrifices were often much deeper. 🙂 Game 1770026
    What if black played Nf8 instead of resigning? It looks like your sacrifice would be in vain. Or am I missing something obvious???
  4. Standard memberEnigmaticCam
    Chess n00b
    Cali
    Joined
    24 Mar '06
    Moves
    7255
    03 May '06 22:551 edit
    Originally posted by ShallowBlue
    What if black played Nf8 instead of resigning? It looks like your sacrifice would be in vain. Or am I missing something obvious???
    Nf8 Rxc7?
  5. EDMONTON ALBERTA
    Joined
    30 Sep '05
    Moves
    10841
    03 May '06 22:56
    Good mate... but he had horrible positioning.
  6. Regina, Saskatchewan
    Joined
    15 Feb '06
    Moves
    1428
    03 May '06 22:59
    or after Nf8 he can do Qg7
  7. EDMONTON ALBERTA
    Joined
    30 Sep '05
    Moves
    10841
    03 May '06 23:01
    Originally posted by ShallowBlue
    What if black played Nf8 instead of resigning? It looks like your sacrifice would be in vain. Or am I missing something obvious???
    bg7+ Kg8 , Bxg8+ Kh8, QorR h7++

    or instead of Kg8, Bxg7, Qxg7++
  8. Standard memberShallowBlue
    Bah Humbug!
    C:\Drive
    Joined
    28 Feb '04
    Moves
    13274
    03 May '06 23:01
    Originally posted by EnigmaticCam
    Nf8 Rxc7?
    Then black plays NxQ
  9. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    03 May '06 23:031 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    03 May '06 23:06

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  11. Standard memberShallowBlue
    Bah Humbug!
    C:\Drive
    Joined
    28 Feb '04
    Moves
    13274
    03 May '06 23:07
    Originally posted by ChessJester
    bg7+ Kg8 , Bxg8+ Kh8, QorR h7++

    or instead of Kg8, Bxg7, Qxg7++
    Ah - knew I was missing something. 🙂
  12. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6500
    04 May '06 00:18
    Not much of a "positional" sac.....Accepting it will produce mate in 2, or 3.....

    I haven't bothered to work out the alternatives for refusing the sac
  13. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    04 May '06 00:251 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  14. back in business
    Joined
    25 Aug '04
    Moves
    1264
    04 May '06 06:301 edit
    Originally posted by powershaker
    but I think the game has a classical beauty to it, and a tinge of Tal somewhere I feel. Only, Tal's sacrifices were often much deeper. 🙂 Game 1770026
    you gotta be kidding. really.

    but well played anyway...
  15. Joined
    19 Nov '05
    Moves
    3112
    04 May '06 06:46
    Nice sacrifice. It definitely has aestetic appeal.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree