1. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    07 Aug '10 18:36
    Hi, everyone. I'm wondering if there are any unconventional ways to refute the Sicilian that are both uncommon and strong (for mid-teen rated players).

    I don't mind so much if high-level chess theory proves it to be unsound.
  2. Joined
    23 Sep '08
    Moves
    25967
    07 Aug '10 18:51
    grand-prix attack.
  3. Joined
    16 Oct '09
    Moves
    2448
    07 Aug '10 18:52
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    Hi, everyone. I'm wondering if there are any unconventional ways to refute the Sicilian that are both uncommon and strong (for mid-teen rated players).

    I don't mind so much if high-level chess theory proves it to be unsound.
    There is no refutation of the Sicilian, it's darn sound. No one would play it if it wasn't! I think by refutation you simply mean, a playable way to face it?
  4. Standard memberThabtos
    I am become Death
    Joined
    23 Apr '10
    Moves
    6343
    07 Aug '10 19:031 edit
    1.d4

    Or more uncommonly,

    1.c4
  5. Joined
    10 May '09
    Moves
    13341
    07 Aug '10 19:08
    Originally posted by Thabtos
    1.d4

    Or more uncommonly,

    1.c4
    I meant after 1 e4
  6. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    07 Aug '10 19:14
    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 (d6; Nc6; e6) 3.Bb5 gets you into playable and less elaborated positions.
  7. Joined
    23 Sep '08
    Moves
    25967
    07 Aug '10 19:15
    grand prix attack is dynamite, it is a difficult proposition for master players apparently, although little me hasnt tried it out properly.
  8. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    3441
    07 Aug '10 20:26
    If anyone had a refutation of the Sicilian they wouldnt be posting it here. They'd be out playing for the World Championship.
  9. Joined
    23 Sep '08
    Moves
    25967
    07 Aug '10 20:52
    My moms quite good at refuting the sicilian, she has a elo of 2279 currently.
  10. Joined
    17 Mar '08
    Moves
    1568
    07 Aug '10 21:06
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 (d6; Nc6; e6) 3.Bb5 gets you into playable and less elaborated positions.
    after d6 or Nc6 ok, but after e6 ?
  11. Joined
    01 Jul '06
    Moves
    44468
    07 Aug '10 22:38
    try this...1.e4 2.c4 3.b3 4.Bb2 5.d3 6.g3 7.Bg2 8.Bb2 9.00 10.f4....depending on what black plays aim for this type of set up!
  12. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113572
    07 Aug '10 23:071 edit
    Originally posted by PAWN RIOT
    try this...1.e4 2.c4 3.b3 4.Bb2 5.d3 6.g3 7.Bg2 8.Bb2 9.00 10.f4....depending on what black plays aim for this type of set up!
    To be honest, I did not take this question very seriously (an "eye roll" question), but your answer has changed all that for me.

    It's not just the moves- it's the idea of taking the game into more closed channels along lines of the English/Reti (or even Bird's Opening by transposition)-it may not be a refutation per se, but it most certainly is a refutation of what Black had intended to accomplish on his first move.

    Bravo! Rec'd.

    Paul
  13. Joined
    01 Jul '06
    Moves
    44468
    07 Aug '10 23:17
    ...you will find this really throws black works well OTB aswel!...of course make sure you add Nge2 first before 00!
  14. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    07 Aug '10 23:25
    Play an Anti-Sicilian. 😕
  15. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    62961
    08 Aug '10 01:54
    Originally posted by savage4731
    If anyone had a refutation of the Sicilian they wouldnt be posting it here. They'd be out playing for the World Championship.
    Yeah it's like asking for an easy way to beat the Ruy Lopez.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree