15 Nov '06 00:39>
Originally posted by cmsMasterYes, but are they? Surely they are some others with different coloured hair who're also dumb? But in the end, only blondes got branded as dumb?
It started by blondes being dumb. 🙁
Originally posted by cmsMasterOh OK, I'll take your word for it. Well, I must say from where I am, I can't tell the difference. We get to see blondes in the movies, of course. And they are generally beautiful people. What a waste if they are really dumb. Thanks for the info. OK. so much of a detour from the main topic.... please proceed with the original topic.... hehehehe.
Because blondes tend to do dumb things.
Originally posted by ckoh1965LMAO, it really depends on the person - not all blondes are dumb. 😀
Oh OK, I'll take your word for it. Well, I must say from where I am, I can't tell the difference. We get to see blondes in the movies, of course. And they are generally beautiful people. What a waste if they are really dumb. Thanks for the info. OK. so much of a detour from the main topic.... please proceed with the original topic.... hehehehe.
Originally posted by VarenkaI'm not very familiar with the Alekhine's Defense. But a friend once told me the idea is to provoke the white player to keep attacking the black knight with his pawns. To the extent that those pawns might later become targets themselves. But I thought white is still better in most cases. He has more space; the black knight chased to the queenside etc. 5. d5 also looks manacingly strong with the support of that c4 pawn. Anyone has the statistics of winning percentage of the Alekhine?
5.f4 is not bad, but I think 5.d5 is best
1.e4 Nf6
2.e5 Nd5
3.d4 Nc6?!
4.c4 Nb6
5.d5
Originally posted by VarenkaWow... thanks for the info, Varenka. I'm fascinated! I must look into it more seriously. Amazing how much one can learn on here.
The idea of 5.d5 is to follow up with c5 next. Black will have to give up a knight. He can get some compensation, but it's not worth a knight.
Originally posted by ckoh1965I'll get around to looking at them over the next few days, flicked through them really quick and in the first there seems to be an awful lot of shuffling around....moves that dont really do much.....almost like cheapo shots instead of trying real things. The second you just let him run all over you in the opening by move 11 blacks position just looks yummy.
Hey Bedlam, can you give me some general advice on my game? I have quite a good grasp of opening principles and some tactical knowledge. But I don't like my own style of play. I think my game is usually too timid. I just don't have the guts to take chances. As the result, I normally prefer slow games. When I develop, I have the tendency to develop passively ...[text shortened]... bear in mind that my opponent's rating is quite substantially lower than mine! Can you help?