Go back
Best four openings for White Tactically

Best four openings for White Tactically

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

What do you think are the best and most sound tactical openings for White? Give me your ideas. I'd like to know. Think I might look at some of the ones I haven't dealt with.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1. Sicilian
2. Queen's Gambit
3. English
4. ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
1. Sicilian
2. Queen's Gambit
3. English
4. ?
What about these four openings for a White player's repertroire if he's going for tactical blows?:

1)Ruy Lopez
2)Guioco Piano
3)English
4)Sicilian ... and...
5)Scotch Game?

Vote Up
Vote Down

If you look for tactics, you can succeed a lot in your rating ranges if you open 1.e4 and go for the next openings:

1. ... e5 - then Scottish gambit or Italian
1. ... c5 - play principal lines, don't try 2. Nc3 or 2. c3 - wherever possible try variations of Rauser's attack ( usually 6. Bg5 )
1. ... e6 - go for Nimzovitch , that is - 2. d4 d5 3. e5
1. ... c6 - try to open the game with exchange variant, which makes the game similar to open debutes, that is 2. d4 d5 3. ed cd 4. Bd3 ...
1. ... d6 - don't go gor the variants with the early f4, try to make normal developmental moves, maybe even a premature pawn exchange on e5 could be a goo idea
1. ... Nf6, 1. ... d5 - usually is played by stronger opponents, don't have ideas right now for what to do with it

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vovochka
If you look for tactics, you can succeed a lot in your rating ranges if you open 1.e4 and go for the next openings:

1. ... e5 - then Scottish gambit or Italian
1. ... c5 - play principal lines, don't try 2. Nc3 or 2. c3 - wherever possible try variations of Rauser's attack ( usually 6. Bg5 )
1. ... e6 - go for Nimzovitch , that is - 2. d4 d5 3. e5 ...[text shortened]... d5 - usually is played by stronger opponents, don't have ideas right now for what to do with it
Yeahhh! What happens when someone plays d5 to e4! I hate when people do that! It makes me feel weird, and I have to slow down my game, and truly contemplate the best responses.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by powershaker
Yeahhh! What happens when someone plays d5 to e4! I hate when people do that! It makes me feel weird, and I have to slow down my game, and truly contemplate the best responses.
Capture the pawn. There are two main lines after that.

2...Qxd5. You play 3.Nc3 to attack his queen with a tempo. Continue afterwards with normal developing moves, Nf3, Bishops out, castle etc.

2...Nf6. Black is trying to play a gambit. Don't stick to his plans. He may wish you to play 3.c4 to create a piece outpost on d4 for him. Continue to develop rapidly and allow him to have the pawn back. If he takes it back, pile the pressure on the knight, Scotch style.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vovochka
If you look for tactics, you can succeed a lot in your rating ranges if you open 1.e4 and go for the next openings:

1. ... e5 - then Scottish gambit or Italian
1. ... c5 - play principal lines, don't try 2. Nc3 or 2. c3 - wherever possible try variations of Rauser's attack ( usually 6. Bg5 )
1. ... e6 - go for Nimzovitch , that is - 2. d4 d5 3. e5 ...[text shortened]... d5 - usually is played by stronger opponents, don't have ideas right now for what to do with it
Don't you think a more standard french like the Winawer is more tactical?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Don't you think a more standard french like the Winawer is more tactical?
I'd aim for an Alekine-Chatard attack if possible against the french.

Possible essay the old evans gambit too, i believe its still considered sound yes?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Don't you think a more standard french like the Winawer is more tactical?
Maybe. Fischer liked it, so that has to be worth a combination or three. 🙂 I just can't see playing the Winawer unless you're well beyond a 2000 rating OTB. I just can't see it. That's why I don't play the King's Indian Attack. I tried playing that over ten years ago, and I read in a book somewhere that it's preposterous to play an Opening or a DEfense that relies so heavily on chess theory. Those openings are made for the best of the best, those who know all the lines, and already have their tactical combinations down 100%. Grandmasters in other words. I just don't think I should play an opening very much reliant on theory. I'm even been thinking about going from the Sicilian Najdorf to the Sicilian, Kan, which has much less theory involved, or perhaps playing them both. Who knows.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I like the Tarrash compared to Winawer. 3.Nd2 instead of 3.Nc3. I hate playing 3.Nc3 OTB and have a long 50+ move game 🙁

1.e4 d5 laugh at them! Take the pawn and develop quickly and try to win tempo's against his queen while developing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
1. Sicilian
2. Queen's Gambit
3. English
4. ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Why do people keep calling the Sicilian a white opening? It's a black defence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Stives
Why do people keep calling the Sicilian a white opening? It's a black defence.
Thank you. It isn't just me that this bugs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by powershaker
Yeahhh! What happens when someone plays d5 to e4! I hate when people do that! It makes me feel weird, and I have to slow down my game, and truly contemplate the best responses.
You can play 2.NF6 dxe4 3. Ng5 if you're into gambits. It's not 100% sound in my book, but it is playable and there are traps in there.

Usually just take the pawn and develop. A typical line is

1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Nf6
3. Bb5+ Bd7
4. Bc4 Bg4+
5. f3

Vote Up
Vote Down

I like 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 and whatever black plays 2...Qxd5 or 2.Nf6 play 3.d4 and get your pieces out.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.